"Global challenges" vs. global class war; Omniwar; dogma and totalitarianism; propaganda and managed democracy; virus/no-virus; the carbon narrative; money as a social technology; the "moon landings"
Comment for David: David, great "guest" (even though I know you were actually the guest, LOL, but still) I appreciated Blaz's intellect / thought process / astuteness, and he's definitely someone I would subscribe to / tune into regularly, if he has a regular outlet where he posts interviews / his content, etc., Enjoyed the discussion.
Comment for Blaz: Blaz, I don't know if you're gonna end up reading through the comments, but just wanted to tell you that I appreciate your awake and observant mind and cool to be introduced to you / discover you, via this post from David. Blaz, the one other "feedback" I would say is-- I was definitely (am definitely) into, hearing your base-premise-thoughts that you give prior to posing the question to David to give his thoughts, but if you wanna tweak your interview modus operandi, I would say, maybe like do a format like this: Prep your question with your base thoughts on the subject ("setting up your question" so to say), as you did, but then pose the question on that particular subject to David and have him answer. And THEN, move on to the next subject or topic, with question. You know what I mean? I think you did too many varied slews of topics in a row, before having David reply. (put another way: Don't move on to the next topic with question to David, until David's given his input on the given one topic, then move on to the next topic w/question, etc., You know what I mean? lol)
Regardless, appreciated the discussion and hearing both of your thoughts on the subjects. Thumbs up.
It's great to have input from other countries. The opportunity for Blaz to share with the West his views, understanding and questions were an important part of the dialogue, especially if there haven't been many such occasions. As David pointed out, truth can be very isolating, especially if you have less chances to be heard, if you're not part of the first 2 big social camps.
A very good and fairly thorough resource for understanding the history of vaccines is the book by Dr Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, "Dissolving Illusions" published in 2013.
Drs Sam and Mark Bailey have many videos posted on youtube.com They help demystify Western medicine for the lay person.
What is mistakenly called 'traditional Western medicine' refers to Rockefeller's allopathic synthesized pharmaceutical medicine, first established by chicanery and Rockefeller's money in 1910 with the take-over of medical schools in the U.S.
What is now referred to as 'Alternative Medicine' was generally traditional medicine.
This is a good interview about the Flexnor Report and it's result, by several doctors on the Independent Medical Alliance website:
Hey Blaz, if you have a podcast or YouTube channel etc., that you post content regularly in English or English subtitles enabled, please post the link here in the comments. Thanks!
Hello Mr Blaz, I'm glad you discovered David A. Hughes. One question: are you aware that nuclear weapons are a bluff, too? I investigated deeply the topic, let me know if you are interested. Thank you!
Like i.e. with Moon landings I am only superficially informed about the subject. Your statement sounds like a possibility. Alison McDowell has published some information about intensive colaboration between Soviet and American nuclear experts. Budapest meeting. Would appreciate some more insight. Thank you.
Great. I think the topic is very important as it totally unmask the idea of a real conflict between Blocks of Nations. There is a book titled "Hiroshima Revisited", by Michael Palmer which shows Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a bluff, but does not go further. The other book, by Akio Nakatani "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapon Hoax" (I haven't read yet the book), but it explains the impossibility of a nuclear explosion. I also recommend the presentation "The Nuclear scare Scam" by Galen Winsor, you can easily find it on odysee and rumble and exposes how nuclear energy is not dangerous like they want us to believe. Both Books are for free (PDF). I did a personal research on the nuclear weapon bluff and I watched a lot of nuclear test bombs, and I discover many many mistakes. They are a combination of chemical explosions (TNT, ANFO. etc..) and clever usage of camera perspective, filters applied to the film and Video overlay tricks, and most likely the technique used by Kubrick to film 2001: A Space Odyssey, the Front Projection Technique. Ps I travel often to Slovenia, maybe if you are interested we can meet in person. I have also information about the 9/11 event. Let me know, thanks. Raul
The “genomic sequencing” for SARS-CoV-2 is complete fraud. The Corman-Drosten team developed the test for Covid-19 based on an In-silico Genetic Sequence (from a computer simulation).
They did not have any viral isolates of Covid-19 available, nor any clinical samples of anyone sick with the alleged new disease. Simply based on that, the test is invalid.
A new medical test must be validated against a 'Gold Standard", that is, a test which is 100% accurate.
The Corman-Drosten team, used the SARS sequence from 2003 (which was never properly purified or isolated, the same procedure was done with this "virus" as well), they then used the PCR primer related to that sequence, amplified it using PCR, sequenced what they amplified (they did this multiple times) and used the sequences that were different from the SARS sequence to develop primers for the diagnostic test. However, since there were no purified samples or Isolates of any kind, this entire experiment is made up.
This was another Drosten-Landt cock-up which is their business model and why they were tasked with this part of the fraud.
A PCR test is not a diagnostic test, as it does not test for the presence of a "virus", it simply tests for genetic material/genetic debri and must be coupled with clinical representation of a specific set of symptoms.
It turns out, when you input the sequences that are being tested for, to show a positive case, the sequences show up 93 times in the human genome, and approx. 91 times from bacteria/fungi (microbes). These supposed "New" sequences show up in nature and are not new at all.
Never mind, you cannot possibly say these sequences are coming from a "new virus" if you don't have "the virus" in the first place.
The team then sends this test to China, to test for this "novel virus" that they created a test for, with none of the "novel virus" at their disposal.
The Chinese find these sequences in their "atypical pneumonia" patients with non-specific respiratory symptoms, (obviously being that these sequences show up in humans), and they create an entire "genome" based off of 1 clinical sample. Repeat, 1 clinical sample and they are off and running.
In order to create a genome correctly, you would need hundreds upon thousands of samples to develop an actual accurate "viral genome", they took 1 person that tested positive with a PCR test created without any "virus."
They take a clinical sample from a PCR positive person's lung fluid, with symptoms consistent with "atypical pneumonia". They take only the short RNA strands from the clinical sample, and put them into a computer program, these programs being: Megahit and Trinity.
These two programs assemble a bunch of contigs (possible genome structures) made up of all the short RNA strands from the person, which number 56 Million.
The Trinity computer came up with 1,329,960 contigs ranging from 201-11,760 base pairs, the Megahit computer came up with 384,096 contigs ranging from 200-30,474 base pairs. In layman, the computer generated almost 2 million possible genome structures.
The longest contig (30,474 base pairs) was chosen, simply because it was the longest one. Upon further investigation, this genome was only 80% similar to SARS-COV-1 "bat-like sequence"- itself a fraud. They then add some Sars-1 sequences to make it look more like a SARS virus. It's all voodoo "science" done through computer sequences and has no basis in biological reality.
80%, is less similar than what humans are to house cats. The claim was the genome totaled to 29,903 bases long, which negates 571 bases from the contig, if those weren't valid how do we know this entire contig is valid?
The contig chosen, was created out of 123,613 different pieces of short RNA from the clinical genetic sample.
They don't know where these sequences are coming from, they don't know if the genome is real, they don't know the amount of error in the process, they don't know how many "reads" were correct, this entire thing is theoretical and computer generated.
Then come thousands of papers and studies and reports all based on...Turtles All The Way Down.
I enjoyed the interview, and felt Blazes contribution valuable. I’m amazed at Mr. Hughes intellect, and ability to hold a vast amount of information, and analyze it. I’m so appreciative!!!
I have never known of an interview where the interviewer takes the stage for half the allotted time. If David Hughes is willing to return, please let him speak. We need his insights in these dangerous times.
In truth, the ideological frameworks that are now coming to fruition have been around, and very public, for many decades. They include:
- The idea of directed evolution. Best stimulated by external shocks incl. trauma (physical, psychological, sexual). This is a cornerstone of late-19th-century Fabian ideology (logo: an actual wolf in sheep's clothing), which birthed the UK Labour Party. Jasun Horsley's books dissect this topic better than anyone.
- Neoliberalism: Been around since the 1930s. Put on a pedestal in the 1960s. (That's when the capitalists decided that social programs were just too costly.) Became the dominant global policy under Reagan and Thatcher. It's not just the financialization of everything. It is also the idea that the market knows best and governs best. That a price tag is the ONLY value there is. So earn your keep, dear citizen, or else.
- Neoliberalism has been deeply productive of commoditization. Again, it's not just buy & sell. 'Commodity' implies that anything - including social relations, religion, even LIFE itself, can be manipulated at will. And of course, discarded when it suits the market.
This is where we are today. It's not hard to extrapolate and get a sense of what the culmination of these trends, already knocking on our door, will look like.
Not sure who's being interviewed here. I feel for David as I struggled to follow the train of thought of the interviewer. Its difficult to follow when a million questions on various subjects are brought up with out the chance to respond to any of them.
I'd like to add to the story of "VIRUS," which seems really essential to me: No one (or almost no one) points out that all the symptoms of VIRUS are also if not completely, similar to EMF symptoms. Just saying. Remenber during the CONVID the implementations of 5 AND 6 G tours ALL OVER THE WORLD!!!!!! Be well.
Comment for David: David, great "guest" (even though I know you were actually the guest, LOL, but still) I appreciated Blaz's intellect / thought process / astuteness, and he's definitely someone I would subscribe to / tune into regularly, if he has a regular outlet where he posts interviews / his content, etc., Enjoyed the discussion.
Comment for Blaz: Blaz, I don't know if you're gonna end up reading through the comments, but just wanted to tell you that I appreciate your awake and observant mind and cool to be introduced to you / discover you, via this post from David. Blaz, the one other "feedback" I would say is-- I was definitely (am definitely) into, hearing your base-premise-thoughts that you give prior to posing the question to David to give his thoughts, but if you wanna tweak your interview modus operandi, I would say, maybe like do a format like this: Prep your question with your base thoughts on the subject ("setting up your question" so to say), as you did, but then pose the question on that particular subject to David and have him answer. And THEN, move on to the next subject or topic, with question. You know what I mean? I think you did too many varied slews of topics in a row, before having David reply. (put another way: Don't move on to the next topic with question to David, until David's given his input on the given one topic, then move on to the next topic w/question, etc., You know what I mean? lol)
Regardless, appreciated the discussion and hearing both of your thoughts on the subjects. Thumbs up.
I thought the exact same as you. It was hard to follow Blaz' thought process because he was all over the place. I felt bad for David, haha.
It's great to have input from other countries. The opportunity for Blaz to share with the West his views, understanding and questions were an important part of the dialogue, especially if there haven't been many such occasions. As David pointed out, truth can be very isolating, especially if you have less chances to be heard, if you're not part of the first 2 big social camps.
Exactly, the interviewer seemed to speak almost as much as his guest (who we were actually there to listen to and not him)
Dr's Sam & Mark Bailey have some good books available re : "viruses"
Also Dawn Lester & David Parker book What Really Makes You ill
A very good and fairly thorough resource for understanding the history of vaccines is the book by Dr Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, "Dissolving Illusions" published in 2013.
Drs Sam and Mark Bailey have many videos posted on youtube.com They help demystify Western medicine for the lay person.
What is mistakenly called 'traditional Western medicine' refers to Rockefeller's allopathic synthesized pharmaceutical medicine, first established by chicanery and Rockefeller's money in 1910 with the take-over of medical schools in the U.S.
What is now referred to as 'Alternative Medicine' was generally traditional medicine.
This is a good interview about the Flexnor Report and it's result, by several doctors on the Independent Medical Alliance website:
https://imahealth.org/the-flexner-report-and-the-rise-of-big-pharma/
Justin Smith produced this history documentary called, "In the shadow of Flexnor" and posted it on tubitiv.com
https://tubitv.com/movies/100031400/in-the-shadow-of-flexner
Grazie Grazie Grazie. Italy was used to kick off cv19. We are in the same situation.
legend
Indeed!!!!
David, thanks again for your valuable insights.
Hey Blaz, if you have a podcast or YouTube channel etc., that you post content regularly in English or English subtitles enabled, please post the link here in the comments. Thanks!
https://regist.substack.com/p/behind-the-un-agenda-2030?r=8ksrx&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
https://rumble.com/v49vsdi-blaz-kavcic-how-we-will-survive-and-thrive.html
We have done a number of discussions with Regis Tremblay.
Hello Mr Blaz, I'm glad you discovered David A. Hughes. One question: are you aware that nuclear weapons are a bluff, too? I investigated deeply the topic, let me know if you are interested. Thank you!
Like i.e. with Moon landings I am only superficially informed about the subject. Your statement sounds like a possibility. Alison McDowell has published some information about intensive colaboration between Soviet and American nuclear experts. Budapest meeting. Would appreciate some more insight. Thank you.
Great. I think the topic is very important as it totally unmask the idea of a real conflict between Blocks of Nations. There is a book titled "Hiroshima Revisited", by Michael Palmer which shows Hiroshima and Nagasaki were a bluff, but does not go further. The other book, by Akio Nakatani "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapon Hoax" (I haven't read yet the book), but it explains the impossibility of a nuclear explosion. I also recommend the presentation "The Nuclear scare Scam" by Galen Winsor, you can easily find it on odysee and rumble and exposes how nuclear energy is not dangerous like they want us to believe. Both Books are for free (PDF). I did a personal research on the nuclear weapon bluff and I watched a lot of nuclear test bombs, and I discover many many mistakes. They are a combination of chemical explosions (TNT, ANFO. etc..) and clever usage of camera perspective, filters applied to the film and Video overlay tricks, and most likely the technique used by Kubrick to film 2001: A Space Odyssey, the Front Projection Technique. Ps I travel often to Slovenia, maybe if you are interested we can meet in person. I have also information about the 9/11 event. Let me know, thanks. Raul
We can meet in person. My e-mail: bfk@siol.com
"Concept of democracy meant managing perception": truth.
The “genomic sequencing” for SARS-CoV-2 is complete fraud. The Corman-Drosten team developed the test for Covid-19 based on an In-silico Genetic Sequence (from a computer simulation).
They did not have any viral isolates of Covid-19 available, nor any clinical samples of anyone sick with the alleged new disease. Simply based on that, the test is invalid.
A new medical test must be validated against a 'Gold Standard", that is, a test which is 100% accurate.
The Corman-Drosten team, used the SARS sequence from 2003 (which was never properly purified or isolated, the same procedure was done with this "virus" as well), they then used the PCR primer related to that sequence, amplified it using PCR, sequenced what they amplified (they did this multiple times) and used the sequences that were different from the SARS sequence to develop primers for the diagnostic test. However, since there were no purified samples or Isolates of any kind, this entire experiment is made up.
This was another Drosten-Landt cock-up which is their business model and why they were tasked with this part of the fraud.
A PCR test is not a diagnostic test, as it does not test for the presence of a "virus", it simply tests for genetic material/genetic debri and must be coupled with clinical representation of a specific set of symptoms.
It turns out, when you input the sequences that are being tested for, to show a positive case, the sequences show up 93 times in the human genome, and approx. 91 times from bacteria/fungi (microbes). These supposed "New" sequences show up in nature and are not new at all.
Never mind, you cannot possibly say these sequences are coming from a "new virus" if you don't have "the virus" in the first place.
The team then sends this test to China, to test for this "novel virus" that they created a test for, with none of the "novel virus" at their disposal.
The Chinese find these sequences in their "atypical pneumonia" patients with non-specific respiratory symptoms, (obviously being that these sequences show up in humans), and they create an entire "genome" based off of 1 clinical sample. Repeat, 1 clinical sample and they are off and running.
In order to create a genome correctly, you would need hundreds upon thousands of samples to develop an actual accurate "viral genome", they took 1 person that tested positive with a PCR test created without any "virus."
They take a clinical sample from a PCR positive person's lung fluid, with symptoms consistent with "atypical pneumonia". They take only the short RNA strands from the clinical sample, and put them into a computer program, these programs being: Megahit and Trinity.
These two programs assemble a bunch of contigs (possible genome structures) made up of all the short RNA strands from the person, which number 56 Million.
The Trinity computer came up with 1,329,960 contigs ranging from 201-11,760 base pairs, the Megahit computer came up with 384,096 contigs ranging from 200-30,474 base pairs. In layman, the computer generated almost 2 million possible genome structures.
The longest contig (30,474 base pairs) was chosen, simply because it was the longest one. Upon further investigation, this genome was only 80% similar to SARS-COV-1 "bat-like sequence"- itself a fraud. They then add some Sars-1 sequences to make it look more like a SARS virus. It's all voodoo "science" done through computer sequences and has no basis in biological reality.
80%, is less similar than what humans are to house cats. The claim was the genome totaled to 29,903 bases long, which negates 571 bases from the contig, if those weren't valid how do we know this entire contig is valid?
The contig chosen, was created out of 123,613 different pieces of short RNA from the clinical genetic sample.
They don't know where these sequences are coming from, they don't know if the genome is real, they don't know the amount of error in the process, they don't know how many "reads" were correct, this entire thing is theoretical and computer generated.
Then come thousands of papers and studies and reports all based on...Turtles All The Way Down.
Fraud.
The bar keeps rising.
Can't wait for the next.
Loved it!
I enjoyed the interview, and felt Blazes contribution valuable. I’m amazed at Mr. Hughes intellect, and ability to hold a vast amount of information, and analyze it. I’m so appreciative!!!
I have never known of an interview where the interviewer takes the stage for half the allotted time. If David Hughes is willing to return, please let him speak. We need his insights in these dangerous times.
Thank you David for clear articulation of dangers of technocratic dictatorship. We have hope that oligarchs are weak cowards who fear awareness!
The only reward they can hope for is this life--Psalm 17:14. They have a lot to fear!
In truth, the ideological frameworks that are now coming to fruition have been around, and very public, for many decades. They include:
- The idea of directed evolution. Best stimulated by external shocks incl. trauma (physical, psychological, sexual). This is a cornerstone of late-19th-century Fabian ideology (logo: an actual wolf in sheep's clothing), which birthed the UK Labour Party. Jasun Horsley's books dissect this topic better than anyone.
- Neoliberalism: Been around since the 1930s. Put on a pedestal in the 1960s. (That's when the capitalists decided that social programs were just too costly.) Became the dominant global policy under Reagan and Thatcher. It's not just the financialization of everything. It is also the idea that the market knows best and governs best. That a price tag is the ONLY value there is. So earn your keep, dear citizen, or else.
- Neoliberalism has been deeply productive of commoditization. Again, it's not just buy & sell. 'Commodity' implies that anything - including social relations, religion, even LIFE itself, can be manipulated at will. And of course, discarded when it suits the market.
This is where we are today. It's not hard to extrapolate and get a sense of what the culmination of these trends, already knocking on our door, will look like.
Not sure who's being interviewed here. I feel for David as I struggled to follow the train of thought of the interviewer. Its difficult to follow when a million questions on various subjects are brought up with out the chance to respond to any of them.
Loved it!
I'd like to add to the story of "VIRUS," which seems really essential to me: No one (or almost no one) points out that all the symptoms of VIRUS are also if not completely, similar to EMF symptoms. Just saying. Remenber during the CONVID the implementations of 5 AND 6 G tours ALL OVER THE WORLD!!!!!! Be well.
This guy talks way too much ...let's listen to the guest please