Many thanks for this, David. You’ve done an excellent job.
Obviously I need to read the book before commenting too much, but I do have a major worry.
I am delighted to learn that two experts such as you and Iain see reasons for optimism but, I have to say, I struggle with this. Maybe I’ve spent too much of my life looking for the hole and not the doughnut, but the prerequisite of our salvation as you say is for the people to wake up to what is unfolding.
And it seems to me a thousand-fold harder to get them to do that here because, quite frankly, what you and Iain describe is damned complicated and very hard to grasp. (By design of course.) I’m fairly familiar with the topic but even I had to continually stop to re-read sentences such as
…decentralised finance using permissioned DLT to issue their own digital currencies…
…Freedom Cities, 15-Minute Cities, Resilient Cities, Charter Cities, Special Economic Zones (SEZs)…
It was hard enough getting people to see the dangers of the vaccines, a fairly easily-grasped notion (or so you might think). How then can we get them to understand the nature of this digital prison being built by stealth, subterfuge and a hailstorm of impenetrable acronyms?
Yes, the alien language and all the other means of deceptions are by design. Most people don't see what is happening.
Perhaps things need to be put in simpler language, more familiar from history. A new form of totalitarianism is being built, a slavery system worse than anything Hitler or Stalin could have envisaged.
As Iain said toward the end of the interview I did with him, it's the same old thing repackaged, oligarchy in digital garb.
The public has already been through this dastardly scheme to steal their freedom. Even if they still don't consciously realise something was seriously amiss, I think subconsciously many people smell a rat, and are primed to listen to information which exposes the Covid scam, the plot to enslave them.
It's how to get through to the people though, when the mainstream media is captured, and free discussion is still suppressed in many quarters?
Perhaps Patrick Woods' and Courtenay Turner's new book "The Final Betrayal" makes it easier. She said it was written "for the masses". It is only about 170 pages. I'm going to read it soon.
People like stories. That is the only way to reach the masses. Someone needs to make an emotional movie about how turning our land and resources into a commodity for sale to the highest bidder affects everyone.
We should be on the front foot in going after the crime already committed, i.e. the 'Covid' scam.
This was used to exploit the people, stealing their freedom and their money, deliberately putting people's countries into debt to control them via a looming social credit system.
This was theft on a ginormous scale, surely the biggest crime in history?
But it was all done without the consent of the people...and it seems that there is still an obligation for informed consent, as I discovered when challenging mandatory COVID-19 vaccination in Australia.
People in the UK were pressured to submit to Covid vaccination, but you didn't get anything like the pressure we had in Australia, where mass populations were denied their livelihood and participation in society if they refused vaccination.
It appears a prime document illustrating what happened in Australia is the report prepared by the Behavioural Economics Team of the Australian Government (BETA), aka the 'nudge unit'.
This report was referred to in an article on The Australian in August 2021, noting that it recommended "Providing vaccinated people with personal freedoms, and restricting the freedoms of those who aren't, is likely to drive vaccine uptake." The Australian reported that this BETA research had been "led by the Health Department and officials at Prime Minister and Cabinet".[1]
This was an outrageous plan - an actual conspiracy between the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Health Department - to deny people their freedom if they refused to submit to vaccination, all a plan to drive vaccine uptake.
And this plan did indeed come to pass via National Cabinet's 'National Plan to transition Australia's National COVID-19 Response'[2] which set requirements for opening up from restrictions, including to "Exempt vaccinated residents from all domestic restrictions". This meant that unvaccinated residents would continue to be under restrictions... It was a form of apartheid, with the unvaccinated effectively excluded from participating in society.
I have sought transparency for the BETA report, under FOI, but so far have twice been denied public access to this report, which had such devastating consequences for Australians' personal autonomy and bodily integrity, for their freedom.
There is much to consider here, in particular that the medical profession collaborated with mandatory vaccination in Australia. Doctors and nurses and other practitioners have an obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination, but they abandoned their personal obligation to obtain voluntary informed consent, and went along with the coercive/mandatory vaccination regime imposed by governments here via National Cabinet.
Meanwhile, I have personal confirmation from the Australian Government that practitioners should obtain informed consent for vaccination (17 November 2022), and I also have a letter confirming this from the regulator of practitioners, AHPRA (20 September 2021). (AHPRA is similar to the GMC in the UK.) See links to these letters below.[3,4]
So while the Australian Government and the practitioners' regulator acknowledged the requirement for voluntary informed consent, this was ignored by government vaccination mandates, in particular vaccination mandates imposed by National Cabinet.
This now gets to the big picture of what has been going on for years, the push to using vaccination as a means to gaining control over people's bodies, starting with children who are subjected to an ever-increasing number of vaccine products, which has become a requirement in countries such as Australia and the US to access services/financial benefits.
Australia has been a specific test bed in this regard with the No Jab, No Pay/No Play vaccination laws for children from 2016, which morphed into No Jab, No Job to No Jab, No Life for adults in the Covid era.
It seems the move to coercive vaccination was a means to establish digital ID via vaccine passports, that these would be the basis to create a broad-ranging digital ID. The infrastructure for this is now in place in Australia for instance via the Australian Immunisation Register to which doctors are compelled to report a range of vaccines given to people in Australia.[5,6] Is this reporting occurring without the express permission of the vaccinated individual, thereby violating consent and privacy? This is something I will pursue...
So far their plans for a vaccine passport have been thwarted - is this because of the realisation that informed consent for vaccination is required, which up to now has been trashed? Think about the significance of this... All the people vaccinated in Australia under coercion and mandates have NOT given valid informed consent - there is no valid consent... What is this going to mean when the penny drops, who is going to be held accountable? I suggest the vaccinating practitioners who didn't obtain valid consent are going to be thrown under the bus. But this has massive implications, all the way up the 'house of cards' that Iain Davis has illustrated in his graphic on public/private partnerships.
There is much to think about here, including for the way ahead re digital ID - can we fight this on the grounds of consent and privacy, using the 'Covid' scandal?
I've written much about this on my substack, Vaccination is political, for instance see these articles re the BETA report:
You are doing great work, Elizabeth. Keep up the pressure!
Although things did not get as extreme in the UK as they did in Australia, similar tactics were deployed transnationally, such as the abuse of applied behavioural psychology, threatening people if they refused to take a toxic experimental substance in their bodies, etc.
This points to the magnitude of what we are dealing with. I have argued that it is, fundamentally, a global class war in which all major institutions - political, legal, regulatory, etc. - can be expected to side with the ruling class against the bulk of the population.
The effect of this is that the social contract has been definitively broken, not by the people, but the governments that no longer serve them. On the contrary, governments have become the implementers of attacks on the population by the transnational deep state. 2020 was an historic moment in that respect.
It is war now. The transnational ruling class is waging Omniwar against societies transnationally with a view to subjugating them under a technocratic control grid.
The solutions to this crisis cannot be found at the political level or the legal level. There is no point, for instance, in petitioning the government to "do better." The UK Government simply ignores the petitions, including the recent one against digital ID which was signed by 2.85 million people (4% of the population). The law courts in country after country have ruled that "lockdowns" - the greatest affront to liberty that Western countries have known in "peacetime" - were constitutional. Public inquiries in country after country are being used to whitewash what really happened: democide, violations of the Nuremberg Code, euthanising the elderly, causing mass harm through injections, etc.
You are right that no one who took a "Covid-19 vaccine" could possibly have given informed consent, implying billions of violations of the Nuremberg Code, mostly facilitated by the medical profession which, to use Kevin Corbett's term, has become "Nazified" (i.e. brought under a command and control system).
For me, the issue is even worse, because countless microscopic and spectroscopic examinations of the "vaccine" contents and of "vaccinated" blood clearly reveal the presence of all manner of material which was not on the list of disclosed ingredients. I share the view of Watt, Latypova, and Lerman that the "vaccines" were really military products. I suspect that the "Covid-19 vaccination" campaign was a worldwide experiment designed to accelerate the possibility of biodigital integration. Vaccination is not merely political, it is military.
Today's Telegraph article on the withholding of vital information that would link "vaccination" to excess mortality in the UK is no doubt part of a planned pressure release. But the real question is, what will the public do with the knowledge that the Government attacked and killed its own citizens?
Objectively speaking, the implications are revolutionary, because governments everywhere have broken with their first obligation, i.e., to protect their citizens.
In terms of subjective awareness, however, it is unclear how many people are getting wise to what has happened. Most people seem to go about their business as though nothing happened. As though small businesses were not made to go under, as though the most ferocious psychological warfare operation in history did not take place, and as though a new era of medicalized totalitarianism were not being ushered in.
The big question now is, will enough people become aware of the situation as it really is and withdraw their compliance from aspects of technocracy, or will enough people find ways of taking action to stop the intended biodigital slavery system from materialising?
You say: "The solutions to this crisis cannot be found at the political level or the legal level. There is no point, for instance, in petitioning the government to "do better.""
I'm not sure I agree with this...
While I'm not keen on legal solutions given the corruption in the system, I do believe in seeking accountability from governments, for exposing their crimes in the court of public opinion, and see what happens from there.
The problem is that the mainstream media is a propaganda machine, designed to keep the public mis/disinformed, so how to enlighten the public?
I don't pretend to know all the historical background on this, I'm just winging it, trying to do a practical grassroots response to this diabolical crime against humanity.
I've referred to this in some of my presentations and describe it as a 'House of Cards'. All the heavies up the top - the Policy Makers BIS, Central Banks etc - they're running the show...but it's all built on the base of a compliant Public. If the Public wakes up and rebels, it can tumble.
An ambitious goal I know...but why not give it a crack?
I suggest the medical practitioners/vaccinators who administered the Covid vaccines are in the slot of 'Policy Propagandists', they're under the instruction of the Policy Enforcers, who in turn are under the Policy Distributors, and the Policy Makers.
But these medical practitioners/vaccinators they've actually followed immoral/unethical/illegal orders - they vaccinated people who were being coerced to submit to vaccination, who were being lied to about the real risk of 'Covid', and were being threatened with penalties for non-compliance - e.g. in Australia with loss of livelihood and participation in society.
This is outrageous in a supposedly 'free society'.
And it seems this dastardly plan to vaccinate mass populations has come unstuck, because they raced away with this scheme, and overlooked that, yes indeed, the vaccinating practitioners DO HAVE a personal obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination. This has been confirmed to me personally in letters from the Australian Government and the regulator AHPRA, as outlined in my previous comment.
So here we are - the crime has been committed on a ginormous scale around the world - vaccinators injected people without valid consent.
And the Australian Government has also confirmed to me that the vaccinators did not have blanket liability protection for administering the injections. The letter I received also expressly stated: "Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."
This is HUGE David... The practitioners DID NOT obtain valid consent from people who were lied to and under coercion. And this isn't just about COVID-19 vaccinations, it's relevant to ALL vaccination, because I argue people are never giving authentic informed consent to vaccination, because they're never properly informed, and they're always pressured to comply.
So think about this and the 'House of Cards'...
If we go after the vaccinators - not in the legal courts now, but in the court of public opinion - we get this out in the open, the way the vaccinators were manipulated to participate in this crime. And then work our way up the House of Cards, the chain of command that put all this in place.
I agree that governments must be held accountable for their crimes in the court of public opinion and that practical steps are needed to ensure that this happens.
You are correct that an alert and non-compliant public makes the agendas of what I call the transnational deep state unenforceable.
There was indeed no informed consent when it came to "Covid-19 vaccination."
Whatever means we can find to triumph in the court of public opinion are the means we must use.
So what do you think about my argument re 'Covid' David, and what happened in Australia? It was appalling here, the unrelenting pressure to vaccinate. It was very difficult for most people to escape the vaccination mandates, and everyone was caught by various restrictions for a time if they didn't submit to the vaccinations.
Unpicking this and working up the house of cards, this has got possibilities to pursue accountability across the board.
More to consider David, re an article published in the Telegraph overnight, see my post: UK public health watchdog accused of a "cover-up" re COVID-19 vaccination. More fuel re the destruction of 'informed consent' for COVID-19 vaccination: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/uk-public-health-watchdog-accused
Education seems the only answer but folk are reluctant to spend the required time to learn. Most articles and podcasts I distribute to those I believe to be even semi-aware (David's Class II) remain unread.
Yes, that’s a big problem. The psychological conditioning is so powerful that many people seem closed off from even trying to open their eyes. It’s quite astonishing, and was one of the most distressing realisations for me during “Covid.”
"Permissionless DLT, for example, could be used for emancipatory purposes. AI could be used to improve, rather than diminish, our lives. Decentralized finance (DeFi) and financial technology (Fintech) could 'free up investment and lead to an explosion of economic, scientific, technological, and social innovation that benefits humanity, not just the oligarchy.'
...
everyone needs to understand the urgent message contained within these pages, and to act on it."
---------
>>> In my opinion that means everyone needs to call for justice, not distributed ledger technology or more AI, and *definitely not* "transitional" justice, but real justice.
---------
"We need a Transitional Justice process to deal with the crimes of the Covid era and the crimes of the 1986 Act and the childhood vaccine schedule
My (Toby Rogers) closing remarks from the Brownstone Institute conference November 1, 2025"
Re DLT: If someone has a technology that works, is legal, constitutional, safe to use and effective, then it will be used and fairly quickly and rightly so and nobody needs to call for its use.
Many thanks for this, David. You’ve done an excellent job.
Obviously I need to read the book before commenting too much, but I do have a major worry.
I am delighted to learn that two experts such as you and Iain see reasons for optimism but, I have to say, I struggle with this. Maybe I’ve spent too much of my life looking for the hole and not the doughnut, but the prerequisite of our salvation as you say is for the people to wake up to what is unfolding.
And it seems to me a thousand-fold harder to get them to do that here because, quite frankly, what you and Iain describe is damned complicated and very hard to grasp. (By design of course.) I’m fairly familiar with the topic but even I had to continually stop to re-read sentences such as
…decentralised finance using permissioned DLT to issue their own digital currencies…
…Freedom Cities, 15-Minute Cities, Resilient Cities, Charter Cities, Special Economic Zones (SEZs)…
It was hard enough getting people to see the dangers of the vaccines, a fairly easily-grasped notion (or so you might think). How then can we get them to understand the nature of this digital prison being built by stealth, subterfuge and a hailstorm of impenetrable acronyms?
Yes, the alien language and all the other means of deceptions are by design. Most people don't see what is happening.
Perhaps things need to be put in simpler language, more familiar from history. A new form of totalitarianism is being built, a slavery system worse than anything Hitler or Stalin could have envisaged.
As Iain said toward the end of the interview I did with him, it's the same old thing repackaged, oligarchy in digital garb.
So how do we get it into simpler language David?
You've been doing much work on this of course, and I recently listened to your Totalitarianism and the Covid Cult, Part 2: https://dhughes.substack.com/p/totalitarianism-and-the-covid-cult-e4d
The public has already been through this dastardly scheme to steal their freedom. Even if they still don't consciously realise something was seriously amiss, I think subconsciously many people smell a rat, and are primed to listen to information which exposes the Covid scam, the plot to enslave them.
It's how to get through to the people though, when the mainstream media is captured, and free discussion is still suppressed in many quarters?
Perhaps Patrick Woods' and Courtenay Turner's new book "The Final Betrayal" makes it easier. She said it was written "for the masses". It is only about 170 pages. I'm going to read it soon.
People like stories. That is the only way to reach the masses. Someone needs to make an emotional movie about how turning our land and resources into a commodity for sale to the highest bidder affects everyone.
Hence my campaign for a Better Vision for Humanity.
https://dhughes.substack.com/p/a-better-vision-for-humanity
Facts and evidence don't move most people, but narratives do.
The transnational deep state has its "strategic narratives."
We needs ours.
I visited your link and added my comment.
Thank you.
Dozens of people have done the same.
My hope is that the comments on that page can serve as a springboard or platform for moving things forward.
Pre printing-press this is how our history was conveyed through generations of course.
We should be on the front foot in going after the crime already committed, i.e. the 'Covid' scam.
This was used to exploit the people, stealing their freedom and their money, deliberately putting people's countries into debt to control them via a looming social credit system.
This was theft on a ginormous scale, surely the biggest crime in history?
But it was all done without the consent of the people...and it seems that there is still an obligation for informed consent, as I discovered when challenging mandatory COVID-19 vaccination in Australia.
People in the UK were pressured to submit to Covid vaccination, but you didn't get anything like the pressure we had in Australia, where mass populations were denied their livelihood and participation in society if they refused vaccination.
It appears a prime document illustrating what happened in Australia is the report prepared by the Behavioural Economics Team of the Australian Government (BETA), aka the 'nudge unit'.
This report was referred to in an article on The Australian in August 2021, noting that it recommended "Providing vaccinated people with personal freedoms, and restricting the freedoms of those who aren't, is likely to drive vaccine uptake." The Australian reported that this BETA research had been "led by the Health Department and officials at Prime Minister and Cabinet".[1]
This was an outrageous plan - an actual conspiracy between the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Health Department - to deny people their freedom if they refused to submit to vaccination, all a plan to drive vaccine uptake.
And this plan did indeed come to pass via National Cabinet's 'National Plan to transition Australia's National COVID-19 Response'[2] which set requirements for opening up from restrictions, including to "Exempt vaccinated residents from all domestic restrictions". This meant that unvaccinated residents would continue to be under restrictions... It was a form of apartheid, with the unvaccinated effectively excluded from participating in society.
I have sought transparency for the BETA report, under FOI, but so far have twice been denied public access to this report, which had such devastating consequences for Australians' personal autonomy and bodily integrity, for their freedom.
There is much to consider here, in particular that the medical profession collaborated with mandatory vaccination in Australia. Doctors and nurses and other practitioners have an obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for medical interventions, including vaccination, but they abandoned their personal obligation to obtain voluntary informed consent, and went along with the coercive/mandatory vaccination regime imposed by governments here via National Cabinet.
Meanwhile, I have personal confirmation from the Australian Government that practitioners should obtain informed consent for vaccination (17 November 2022), and I also have a letter confirming this from the regulator of practitioners, AHPRA (20 September 2021). (AHPRA is similar to the GMC in the UK.) See links to these letters below.[3,4]
So while the Australian Government and the practitioners' regulator acknowledged the requirement for voluntary informed consent, this was ignored by government vaccination mandates, in particular vaccination mandates imposed by National Cabinet.
This now gets to the big picture of what has been going on for years, the push to using vaccination as a means to gaining control over people's bodies, starting with children who are subjected to an ever-increasing number of vaccine products, which has become a requirement in countries such as Australia and the US to access services/financial benefits.
Australia has been a specific test bed in this regard with the No Jab, No Pay/No Play vaccination laws for children from 2016, which morphed into No Jab, No Job to No Jab, No Life for adults in the Covid era.
It seems the move to coercive vaccination was a means to establish digital ID via vaccine passports, that these would be the basis to create a broad-ranging digital ID. The infrastructure for this is now in place in Australia for instance via the Australian Immunisation Register to which doctors are compelled to report a range of vaccines given to people in Australia.[5,6] Is this reporting occurring without the express permission of the vaccinated individual, thereby violating consent and privacy? This is something I will pursue...
So far their plans for a vaccine passport have been thwarted - is this because of the realisation that informed consent for vaccination is required, which up to now has been trashed? Think about the significance of this... All the people vaccinated in Australia under coercion and mandates have NOT given valid informed consent - there is no valid consent... What is this going to mean when the penny drops, who is going to be held accountable? I suggest the vaccinating practitioners who didn't obtain valid consent are going to be thrown under the bus. But this has massive implications, all the way up the 'house of cards' that Iain Davis has illustrated in his graphic on public/private partnerships.
There is much to think about here, including for the way ahead re digital ID - can we fight this on the grounds of consent and privacy, using the 'Covid' scandal?
I've written much about this on my substack, Vaccination is political, for instance see these articles re the BETA report:
- Restrict the freedoms of the unvaccinated'. Where is the BETA report that called for this treachery: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/restrict-the-freedoms-of-the-unvaccinated
- REJECTED! FOI for the BETA report which recommended 'restrict the freedoms of the unvaccinated': https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/rejected-foi-for-the-beta-report
- “restricting the freedoms” of the unvaccinated - UPDATE re FOI for the BETA Report: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/restricting-the-freedoms-of-the-unvaccinated
References:
1. ‘Freedom incentives’ to spur vaccination as Scott Morrison rejects cash. The Australian, 2/3 August 2021: https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/freedom-incentives-to-spur-vaccination-as-scott-morrison-rejects-cash/news-story/91b29bb9fffa3b5c69fa5112235479e5 (behind the paywall).
2. https://pmtranscripts.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-06/national-plan-060821_0.pdf
3. Letter to Elizabeth Hart from the Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government, 17 November 2022: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf
4. Response from AHPRA, 20 September 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/response-from-ahpra-re-informed-consent.pdf
5. Australian Immunisation Register: https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/australian-immunisation-register
6. Mandatory reporting changes to the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR) from 1 March 2025: https://www.health.gov.au/news/mandatory-reporting-changes-to-the-australian-immunisation-register-air-from-1-march-2025
https://www.servicesaustralia.gov.au/australian-immunisation-register
You are doing great work, Elizabeth. Keep up the pressure!
Although things did not get as extreme in the UK as they did in Australia, similar tactics were deployed transnationally, such as the abuse of applied behavioural psychology, threatening people if they refused to take a toxic experimental substance in their bodies, etc.
This points to the magnitude of what we are dealing with. I have argued that it is, fundamentally, a global class war in which all major institutions - political, legal, regulatory, etc. - can be expected to side with the ruling class against the bulk of the population.
The effect of this is that the social contract has been definitively broken, not by the people, but the governments that no longer serve them. On the contrary, governments have become the implementers of attacks on the population by the transnational deep state. 2020 was an historic moment in that respect.
It is war now. The transnational ruling class is waging Omniwar against societies transnationally with a view to subjugating them under a technocratic control grid.
The solutions to this crisis cannot be found at the political level or the legal level. There is no point, for instance, in petitioning the government to "do better." The UK Government simply ignores the petitions, including the recent one against digital ID which was signed by 2.85 million people (4% of the population). The law courts in country after country have ruled that "lockdowns" - the greatest affront to liberty that Western countries have known in "peacetime" - were constitutional. Public inquiries in country after country are being used to whitewash what really happened: democide, violations of the Nuremberg Code, euthanising the elderly, causing mass harm through injections, etc.
You are right that no one who took a "Covid-19 vaccine" could possibly have given informed consent, implying billions of violations of the Nuremberg Code, mostly facilitated by the medical profession which, to use Kevin Corbett's term, has become "Nazified" (i.e. brought under a command and control system).
For me, the issue is even worse, because countless microscopic and spectroscopic examinations of the "vaccine" contents and of "vaccinated" blood clearly reveal the presence of all manner of material which was not on the list of disclosed ingredients. I share the view of Watt, Latypova, and Lerman that the "vaccines" were really military products. I suspect that the "Covid-19 vaccination" campaign was a worldwide experiment designed to accelerate the possibility of biodigital integration. Vaccination is not merely political, it is military.
Today's Telegraph article on the withholding of vital information that would link "vaccination" to excess mortality in the UK is no doubt part of a planned pressure release. But the real question is, what will the public do with the knowledge that the Government attacked and killed its own citizens?
Objectively speaking, the implications are revolutionary, because governments everywhere have broken with their first obligation, i.e., to protect their citizens.
In terms of subjective awareness, however, it is unclear how many people are getting wise to what has happened. Most people seem to go about their business as though nothing happened. As though small businesses were not made to go under, as though the most ferocious psychological warfare operation in history did not take place, and as though a new era of medicalized totalitarianism were not being ushered in.
The big question now is, will enough people become aware of the situation as it really is and withdraw their compliance from aspects of technocracy, or will enough people find ways of taking action to stop the intended biodigital slavery system from materialising?
Thanks for your response David.
You say: "The solutions to this crisis cannot be found at the political level or the legal level. There is no point, for instance, in petitioning the government to "do better.""
I'm not sure I agree with this...
While I'm not keen on legal solutions given the corruption in the system, I do believe in seeking accountability from governments, for exposing their crimes in the court of public opinion, and see what happens from there.
The problem is that the mainstream media is a propaganda machine, designed to keep the public mis/disinformed, so how to enlighten the public?
I don't pretend to know all the historical background on this, I'm just winging it, trying to do a practical grassroots response to this diabolical crime against humanity.
Looking at Iain Davis/Richard D Hall's graphic The Global Public-Private Partnership: https://iaindavis.com/what-is-the-global-public-private-partnership/
I've referred to this in some of my presentations and describe it as a 'House of Cards'. All the heavies up the top - the Policy Makers BIS, Central Banks etc - they're running the show...but it's all built on the base of a compliant Public. If the Public wakes up and rebels, it can tumble.
An ambitious goal I know...but why not give it a crack?
I suggest the medical practitioners/vaccinators who administered the Covid vaccines are in the slot of 'Policy Propagandists', they're under the instruction of the Policy Enforcers, who in turn are under the Policy Distributors, and the Policy Makers.
But these medical practitioners/vaccinators they've actually followed immoral/unethical/illegal orders - they vaccinated people who were being coerced to submit to vaccination, who were being lied to about the real risk of 'Covid', and were being threatened with penalties for non-compliance - e.g. in Australia with loss of livelihood and participation in society.
This is outrageous in a supposedly 'free society'.
And it seems this dastardly plan to vaccinate mass populations has come unstuck, because they raced away with this scheme, and overlooked that, yes indeed, the vaccinating practitioners DO HAVE a personal obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination. This has been confirmed to me personally in letters from the Australian Government and the regulator AHPRA, as outlined in my previous comment.
So here we are - the crime has been committed on a ginormous scale around the world - vaccinators injected people without valid consent.
And the Australian Government has also confirmed to me that the vaccinators did not have blanket liability protection for administering the injections. The letter I received also expressly stated: "Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."
This is HUGE David... The practitioners DID NOT obtain valid consent from people who were lied to and under coercion. And this isn't just about COVID-19 vaccinations, it's relevant to ALL vaccination, because I argue people are never giving authentic informed consent to vaccination, because they're never properly informed, and they're always pressured to comply.
So think about this and the 'House of Cards'...
If we go after the vaccinators - not in the legal courts now, but in the court of public opinion - we get this out in the open, the way the vaccinators were manipulated to participate in this crime. And then work our way up the House of Cards, the chain of command that put all this in place.
There are massive ramifications to think about...
I agree that governments must be held accountable for their crimes in the court of public opinion and that practical steps are needed to ensure that this happens.
You are correct that an alert and non-compliant public makes the agendas of what I call the transnational deep state unenforceable.
There was indeed no informed consent when it came to "Covid-19 vaccination."
Whatever means we can find to triumph in the court of public opinion are the means we must use.
Keep up the good work!
Re the 'house of cards' and Iain Davis's graphic re The Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P), see this link for the graphic: https://iaindavis.com/what-is-the-global-public-private-partnership/
Also acknowledging Richard D Hall who Iain says first came up with the idea of the G3P chart.
Yes, Richard D Hall was first to most things, which is why the State went after him.
He has massive public support, though, and rightly so.
So what do you think about my argument re 'Covid' David, and what happened in Australia? It was appalling here, the unrelenting pressure to vaccinate. It was very difficult for most people to escape the vaccination mandates, and everyone was caught by various restrictions for a time if they didn't submit to the vaccinations.
Unpicking this and working up the house of cards, this has got possibilities to pursue accountability across the board.
I'll come back to that.
01:30 here in the UK - your remarks deserve a proper reply.
More to consider David, re an article published in the Telegraph overnight, see my post: UK public health watchdog accused of a "cover-up" re COVID-19 vaccination. More fuel re the destruction of 'informed consent' for COVID-19 vaccination: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/uk-public-health-watchdog-accused
Thanks David, better go to sleep!
I didn't quit David's sub but it's not showing me as a paid subscriber anymore?
I am in the process of migrating subscribers onto my new website. Please bear with me. Shouldn't take long.
No problem. Good stuff David. Hope you had a nice Christmas.
Education seems the only answer but folk are reluctant to spend the required time to learn. Most articles and podcasts I distribute to those I believe to be even semi-aware (David's Class II) remain unread.
Yes, that’s a big problem. The psychological conditioning is so powerful that many people seem closed off from even trying to open their eyes. It’s quite astonishing, and was one of the most distressing realisations for me during “Covid.”
"Permissionless DLT, for example, could be used for emancipatory purposes. AI could be used to improve, rather than diminish, our lives. Decentralized finance (DeFi) and financial technology (Fintech) could 'free up investment and lead to an explosion of economic, scientific, technological, and social innovation that benefits humanity, not just the oligarchy.'
...
everyone needs to understand the urgent message contained within these pages, and to act on it."
---------
>>> In my opinion that means everyone needs to call for justice, not distributed ledger technology or more AI, and *definitely not* "transitional" justice, but real justice.
---------
"We need a Transitional Justice process to deal with the crimes of the Covid era and the crimes of the 1986 Act and the childhood vaccine schedule
My (Toby Rogers) closing remarks from the Brownstone Institute conference November 1, 2025"
https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/we-need-a-transitional-justice-process
---------
Re DLT: If someone has a technology that works, is legal, constitutional, safe to use and effective, then it will be used and fairly quickly and rightly so and nobody needs to call for its use.
I think we need justice AND a financial system that does not serve the oligarchs.