Hi David ,I have come across Mark Steele ,if it's the same guy, before , a Geordie with a very aggressive manner with a history of shooting someone ( apparently by mistake )in the past .He had some kind of communication business . Years ago he was talking about certain lampposts in Gateshead being highly dangerous.When a serious gentleman with equipment that could measure EMF s offered to help him he rebuffed him . Think he's working for the bad guys . Nothing gets past you it's wonderful that such a clever guy with the utmost integrity is working for the good of humanity .
What a mess. This feels like a 'dog's breakfast' of concerns. The flyer seems poorly worded. Then there is technical confusion. The abuse is wholly unnecessary, disappointing and a red flag.
Andrew Bridgen strangely appears on the scene amidst more cash raising. The whole thing seems rushed and last minute, amateurish even, especially considering the need for high precision accuracy and robust hard evidence.
I'm sensing 'Camp 2' confusion, distraction, potential email entrapment and entanglement. Or is this just an unfortunate case of bad communication? 'Lost in Translation' perhaps?
(This follows on from the recent Sabrina Wallace fallout too).
Yes, the timing is certainly interesting. It definitely has the whiff of Camp 2 about it. And as you say, Bridgen reappears in another suspect fundraiser...
You give us a compelling demonstration of how to call someone out revealing the complete thought process. Perhaps discernment can't be taught, but I think illustrative examples like this help us all think in new ways. "Calling Out" is right up there with "Don't Comply!"
I greatly appreciate your adherence to logic when evaluating the veracity of propositions.
I find that a very large percentage of people primarily operate on the premise "what makes sense, must be true"... and this type of thinking facilitates the assumption that plausible scenarios - - often those that align with generally demonstrated themes (ie: transnational elites having no qualms with causing death and harm in pursuit of their goals) - - are definitely real.
Throughout my conversations with others, I frequently bring up the fact that "just because something makes sense, doesn't meant that it's true." ... I am a strong proponent of speculation/brainstorming, but guide rails must always be put in place to remind oneself that it is indeed just speculation.
Agreed. There are strong theoretical reasons to suspect that some very dark things are happening in the Omniwar. However, that needs to be measured against empirical evidence. We made that point in the second Omniwar symposium, I made it with respect to Wallace, and I am making it again here.
I was genuinely interested to know what the evidence was of weaponry having been installed in ULEZ cameras. I assumed that if they were going to court, they must have strong evidence. That turned out not to be the case, however.
Hi David ,I have come across Mark Steele ,if it's the same guy, before , a Geordie with a very aggressive manner with a history of shooting someone ( apparently by mistake )in the past .He had some kind of communication business . Years ago he was talking about certain lampposts in Gateshead being highly dangerous.When a serious gentleman with equipment that could measure EMF s offered to help him he rebuffed him . Think he's working for the bad guys . Nothing gets past you it's wonderful that such a clever guy with the utmost integrity is working for the good of humanity .
Thanks, Eileen.
Yes, that's the guy.
In this line of work, one never knows what to expect from day to day!
What a mess. This feels like a 'dog's breakfast' of concerns. The flyer seems poorly worded. Then there is technical confusion. The abuse is wholly unnecessary, disappointing and a red flag.
Andrew Bridgen strangely appears on the scene amidst more cash raising. The whole thing seems rushed and last minute, amateurish even, especially considering the need for high precision accuracy and robust hard evidence.
I'm sensing 'Camp 2' confusion, distraction, potential email entrapment and entanglement. Or is this just an unfortunate case of bad communication? 'Lost in Translation' perhaps?
(This follows on from the recent Sabrina Wallace fallout too).
Yes, the timing is certainly interesting. It definitely has the whiff of Camp 2 about it. And as you say, Bridgen reappears in another suspect fundraiser...
There was I thinking that the peace keepers were all about evidence, rather disappointing. Thanks for highlighting this David.
You're welcome.
The public should at least have this information to hand, and then it can make an informed decision as to whether to support the fundraiser or not.
Reading with interest from Canada , thank you David.
Hi David,
You give us a compelling demonstration of how to call someone out revealing the complete thought process. Perhaps discernment can't be taught, but I think illustrative examples like this help us all think in new ways. "Calling Out" is right up there with "Don't Comply!"
I greatly appreciate your adherence to logic when evaluating the veracity of propositions.
I find that a very large percentage of people primarily operate on the premise "what makes sense, must be true"... and this type of thinking facilitates the assumption that plausible scenarios - - often those that align with generally demonstrated themes (ie: transnational elites having no qualms with causing death and harm in pursuit of their goals) - - are definitely real.
Throughout my conversations with others, I frequently bring up the fact that "just because something makes sense, doesn't meant that it's true." ... I am a strong proponent of speculation/brainstorming, but guide rails must always be put in place to remind oneself that it is indeed just speculation.
Agreed. There are strong theoretical reasons to suspect that some very dark things are happening in the Omniwar. However, that needs to be measured against empirical evidence. We made that point in the second Omniwar symposium, I made it with respect to Wallace, and I am making it again here.
My goodness, you did a bang-up job addressing what they sent you. Well done, and I'm sure it was time consuming! Thanks for making this public.
I was genuinely interested to know what the evidence was of weaponry having been installed in ULEZ cameras. I assumed that if they were going to court, they must have strong evidence. That turned out not to be the case, however.