Contrary to the "nanothermite" hypothesis of the "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth," the Twin Towers were evidently destroyed at low temperatures, revealing the reality of "Cold Fusion"
I would like to bring the following parallel to everyone's attention. The patterns of destruction at WTC5 and WTC6 are same as at Murrah Building Oklahoma 1995. Giant round vertical holes in the building having diameters of some ten to twenty meters with the structure inside the 'drilling holes' missing.
This can not be explained by the use of conventional explosives.
In case you don't know: Murrah Building was NOT destroyed by a homemade fertilizer bomb. I recommend David Hoffman's Book „The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror“.
Why is that of so much importance? Oklahoma city bombing was the first big blow against US liberty. It resulted in a decrease of civil rights to counter 'domestic terrorism'. (should correctly be named state terrorism).
The second blow of course was 9-11 and anthrax-letters (an inside job) ending up with the so called patriot act.
What is puzzling me: I as a guy in Germany am able to spot the parallels mentioned above. But people in the USA seemingly are not. Is that really so? I would be happy to get any feedback on that.
If you want to check it out. Try to find a picture of destroyed Murrah building where the edge of flat roof has not yet been covered with blanket masking the sharp rounded 'cutting edges'.
Yes, the OKC bombing looks like a dress rehearsal in some ways for the destruction of the WTC. Not just in terms of what you mention, but also the use of patsies, the same companies on site afterwards, the introduction of draconian legislation in response, and the militarisation of the domestic arena.
"Immediately after their destruction, the debris from the Twin Towers was practically at ground level, no higher than their lobbies (Ch. 9). Where did the rest go?
...
(Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) AE911T’s dominant role in steering critical opinion leads people away from the most critical questions and evidence regarding the disappearance of the Twin Towers — laid out by Wood (2011) in by far the most comprehensive forensic investigation of that phenomenon to date — and instead suspiciously censors or caricatures Wood’s work.
...
Thus, Wood and Reynolds explicitly do not claim that 'space beams' destroyed the Twin Towers, but rather that energy weapons must be considered as one possibility given problems in attributing the towers’ destruction to kinetic energy. It seems that the subversive potential of this idea was immediately recognized and met with attempts to thwart Wood.
...
Harvard historian of science, Peter Galison (2004, p. 231), estimates that the volume of classified scientific research is five to ten times greater than publicly available
...
In the case of the Twin Towers, the evidence points strongly in the direction of black technology."
With regards to Maui, there are a few things to consider....
It's important to differentiate between "Hot DEW" and "Cold DEW" - the tech. that destroyed the WTC generates little to no heat, whereas in the Maui and California fires, it's a bit different - with much more evidence of heat, but anomalous fires.
The other important evidence to study is that relating to Hurricane Erin on 9/11.
Use of DEW & Climate/Weather Manipulation technologies has a much longer history than most will acknowledge. Congratulations to Judy Wood for an enduring and even prophetic explanation for the intentional, strategic destruction and murder of inhabitants / structures as a pretext for conducting middle eastern operations designed to "soften up" and condition nations in the gunsights of the nation state calling itself Israel's planned expansion and the need for demonstrations of foreign power to aid in the accomplishment of their plans. The multi-layer (3 level?) coverup and continuing mythology around this date has served to bolster the synthesized red-white-and-blue support for foreign entanglements and the sacrifice of American and foreign lives to the mystery religion Gods in order to sustain a presence in and the ability to purloin and control assets in the middle east.
The fact (?) that her PhD research assistant was murdered says a lot. Ditto for James Corbett apparently not wanting to touch it. I believe that was the case with Julian Assange as well. Bravo for having the courage to defend this brilliant woman. Did she discuss "the planes" at all?
James Corbett didn't apologize. That was James Evan Pilato who did. Corbett talked around how there wasn't anything really new in the video, hardly any kind of apology.
I know we all have our own cognitive limitations, and I am extremely grateful for all the work Corbett has done down the years, but I do find it odd how he won't touch (i) the moon landings, (ii) Judy Wood, and (iii) evidence of nanotech in the shots. It is as though, for deep structural events, there is a line beyond which he will not go.
I don't blame James for not addressing this issue, either. Only so many hours in the day. HOWEVER!!!! He has not yet backtracked on 2 coveed points. First, he had on another podcaster who appears to me to be rather uneducated and the 2 of them chuckled over those crazy no virus people. Grrrrr. More importantly, he interviewed (if you could call it that) methias desmet and fell for his baloney, hook, line and sinker. 10x grrrrr.
Interviewing someone doesn't mean that you agree with them, and Corbett did challenge Desmet over the chapter in his book where he attacks "conspiracy theorists." But I hear what you're saying.
Yes, David, I know, but that would be what he challenged because he's a self described conspiracy theorist. Imho, he should have had Breggin on to counter. Or now that you've published and are becoming known, he should have you on. I called him on it via email and suggested he get one of you on to correct the record and of course he never answered. He has done very thorough work on other topics, but at times it seems to me, and especially with da coveed, his work can be rather shallow. I guess this one weakness really bothers me because 1. it's in my wheelhouse, 2. I think this is for all the marbles. Thank you for this conversation, btw. ;-)
I think that's a fair question. I'm grateful for many of TCR's posts during the past 15 or so years, but a comment I recently heard from someone I met over the weekend, David's research, and your above link make me realize there's much deeper/more relevant information available. The phrase, "Penetrate the ostensible," appear applicable to nearly everything I look at these days. Thanks for sharing!
You outdid yourself (and that's not easy) on this piece. It could be a book. I posted a link to it on Richard Gage's substack. We'll see if I get removed or comments!
You sharing your insights and quality of attention on any area is a gift to all of us. May this and all you do travel far and wide on the winds, like the puffy seeds of flowers floating by.
Your work and voice is important and extraordinary.
I did a deep dive into cold fusion 12 years ago, visited several labs, looked at their data, and came away convinced that cold fusion technology is real. Whether it explains what Judy Wood documents is another question.
The "cold" in cold fusion refers to the fact that you don't need million degree temperatures to get it started. It does not mean that the energy is released without enormous heat.
My best guess is that advanced technology was used to bring down the Twin Towers, but that it was something more exotic than cold fusion.
There are many people who have reported the existence of whole underground cities, based on technologies that are not available to the rest of humanity.
What is your evidence regarding the "enormous heat" involved in cold fusion? For example, this is how it is typically reported: "In 1989, chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann (Fig. 2) made headlines with claims that they had produced fusion at room temperature—“cold” fusion compared to the high temperatures the process was thought to require." https://undsci.berkeley.edu/lessons/pdfs/cold_fusion.pdf
I enjoyed your two pieces on cold fusion. For the benefit of readers, here are some quotes I picked out from them:
"Those who stand to lose if CF becomes viable are far more numerous and more powerful than a handful of scientists collecting billions of dollars in research contracts for hot fusion. There is plenty of money sunk in investments that would be worthless if cheap, dispersed CF cogeneration were a reality. Current value of oil in the ground is in the neighborhood of $100 trillion. The electric grid worldwide likewise is valued at tens of trillions of dollars. And the US dollar itself, since 1972, has been backed by Middle-East oil. So perhaps we don’t have to look far for candidate conspirators who have a stake in making sure that CF never comes to market."
"I think it plausible that CF technology holds the key to creating a megaton bomb with technology that could be managed by a basement hobbyist." (Or was it deployed in the basements?)
"A hypothetical small weapon based on cold fusion would be a graver temptation for Strangelovian military planners. It might be used deniably, without a significant radiation signature. It could be used near inhabited areas without creating a permanent hazard." (Or indeed in densely inhabited areas?)
In the paradigm endorsed by conventional science, the only way to get hydrogen to fuse to helium is to heat it to ~a million degrees. This happens inside a uranium bomb, which is the trigger for a hydrogen bomb. They've been trying to make it happen in a Tokomak for 60 years, with little success.
In the Pons-Fleischmann experiment, fusion was ignited at room temperature. Somehow, the palladium crystal was able to guide deuterium atoms to fuse together. The physics behind this is not well understood.
The energy that came out WAS in the form of heat. In the tiny experiment, with tiny amounts of deuterium fuel, they sometimes observed noticeable "excess heat" that raised the temperature of water flow. On one occasion, the heat from just milligrams of deuterium was enough to melt the lab table and excavate the concrete floor of the lab.
My point is that "cold fusion" is called that because it is not INITIALIZED by heat. But the heat created in any fusion reaction is enormous.
I agree that cold fusion may have been part of the recipe for destruction of the WTC towers. The best evidence for this is that CF creates much less radioactivity than hot fusion. But any CF device would be expected to create enormous heat energy, which seems inconsistent with what Judy Wood has shown us.
Thank you, David, for you attention to this on yet another anniversary. I know people who still accept the official narrative.
It remains an ominous marker; the point in which the ramping up of global control was announced. With two decades plus behind us, the Patriot act and all the other mechanisms put in place to suspend or dismantle basic human rights - under the pretext of security - is laid bare.
The audacity of it - and getting away with it - likely gave confidence to the even larger operations planned - including the Covid pysop.
Jones clearly seems an infiltrator. We are always playing catch-up to the perception-managers.
How was concrete turned to dust? Here's a speculation:
Compare the way water is heated in a pot over a flame compared to water in a microwave oven. The flame is thousands of degrees, far hotter than boiling water, and that heat is transferred by conduction to the pot, by convection through the water. But in a microwave oven, the heat is suffused through the water, so the water heats much more uniformly.
A bomb is a localized source of energy, like a flame, and the damage must be transmitted through heat and pressure that spreads out from the bomb. What happened to the Twin Towers looks more like a microwave oven. The energy was injected uniformly through the concrete so that it pulverized homogeneously, without localized concentrations of heat.
Disclaimer: I know of no technology in the public domain that could do this. But DARPA has a great deal of technology that is not publicly disclosed, even if we don't speculate about a "breakaway civilization". It might work, like a microwave oven, with directed energy -- a beam of particles or radiation that penetrates through the concrete and is absorbed in the interior. Even more speculative, there might be some way to induce nuclear reactions (at a low level) within the concrete that injects the energy uniformly with less outside power required.
To me it does look as though there was a localized source of energy at the bottom centre of each tower. That would explain what Heinz Pommer calls the "fountain effect" of the destruction. Meanwhile, the upper 30 floor descended vertically straight into the path of the upwards blast and were dustified. The survivors on stairwell B, close to the bottom of the towers, would also be explained by being situated just below the "V" of the "fountain." A localized source of energy is also consistent with traditional nuclear weapons. I agree that DARPA classified technology seems like the most likely explanation.
In Judy Woods's book, she speculates about effects that John Hutchinson says he was able to create, using ideas borrowed from Tesla.
(Confusingly, there's also an unrelated Ian Hutchinson, who sought to debunk the possibility of cold fusion.)
Conventional physics has no explanation for the "Hutchinson effect." But reproducing his experiments might be a fruitful avenue to explore, both to learn new physics and also to develop revolutionary technologies.
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), the Hutchison Effect and Dr Judy Wood
I would like to bring the following parallel to everyone's attention. The patterns of destruction at WTC5 and WTC6 are same as at Murrah Building Oklahoma 1995. Giant round vertical holes in the building having diameters of some ten to twenty meters with the structure inside the 'drilling holes' missing.
This can not be explained by the use of conventional explosives.
In case you don't know: Murrah Building was NOT destroyed by a homemade fertilizer bomb. I recommend David Hoffman's Book „The Oklahoma City Bombing and the Politics of Terror“.
https://archive.org/details/oklahomacitybomb00hoff/mode/2up
Why is that of so much importance? Oklahoma city bombing was the first big blow against US liberty. It resulted in a decrease of civil rights to counter 'domestic terrorism'. (should correctly be named state terrorism).
The second blow of course was 9-11 and anthrax-letters (an inside job) ending up with the so called patriot act.
What is puzzling me: I as a guy in Germany am able to spot the parallels mentioned above. But people in the USA seemingly are not. Is that really so? I would be happy to get any feedback on that.
If you want to check it out. Try to find a picture of destroyed Murrah building where the edge of flat roof has not yet been covered with blanket masking the sharp rounded 'cutting edges'.
Yes, the OKC bombing looks like a dress rehearsal in some ways for the destruction of the WTC. Not just in terms of what you mention, but also the use of patsies, the same companies on site afterwards, the introduction of draconian legislation in response, and the militarisation of the domestic arena.
Awesome research
"Immediately after their destruction, the debris from the Twin Towers was practically at ground level, no higher than their lobbies (Ch. 9). Where did the rest go?
...
(Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) AE911T’s dominant role in steering critical opinion leads people away from the most critical questions and evidence regarding the disappearance of the Twin Towers — laid out by Wood (2011) in by far the most comprehensive forensic investigation of that phenomenon to date — and instead suspiciously censors or caricatures Wood’s work.
...
Thus, Wood and Reynolds explicitly do not claim that 'space beams' destroyed the Twin Towers, but rather that energy weapons must be considered as one possibility given problems in attributing the towers’ destruction to kinetic energy. It seems that the subversive potential of this idea was immediately recognized and met with attempts to thwart Wood.
...
Harvard historian of science, Peter Galison (2004, p. 231), estimates that the volume of classified scientific research is five to ten times greater than publicly available
...
In the case of the Twin Towers, the evidence points strongly in the direction of black technology."
Here is my mix I put together from all my interactions with these “experts” putting their feet in their mouths in 2023 – They don’t like me much, lol
2h video interactions: https://rumble.com/v3xm981-911-truth-greatest-hits-2023-extended-cut.html
In 2023 Andrew Johnson squared off, face to face with Richard Gage.
Video: https://rumble.com/v47ixbo-911-truth-richard-gage-vs-andrew-johnson.html
Accompanying article;
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
D.E.P.S.
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
Did the D.E.P.S. do the Maui fires? If so, why?
With regards to Maui, there are a few things to consider....
It's important to differentiate between "Hot DEW" and "Cold DEW" - the tech. that destroyed the WTC generates little to no heat, whereas in the Maui and California fires, it's a bit different - with much more evidence of heat, but anomalous fires.
The other important evidence to study is that relating to Hurricane Erin on 9/11.
It's important not to speculate and mix together different bits of evidence because it looks similar. Some folks do this to a much greater extent. Please see the original material at http://www.drjudywood.com/ and http://tinyurl.com/911ftb and http://tinyurl.com/911htb as well as https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=256&part=2&gen=3
I will also refer you to this article...
DEW is on fire in Maui
People are just jumping to conclusions, don't be caught out.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/dew-is-on-fire-in-maui
Linked article is an interesting read, also the comments.
"It's important not to speculate"
I guess we should just wait for experts? Where have I heard that before?
I will speculate all I want, thank you.
Thank you very much for sharing these important links!
Use of DEW & Climate/Weather Manipulation technologies has a much longer history than most will acknowledge. Congratulations to Judy Wood for an enduring and even prophetic explanation for the intentional, strategic destruction and murder of inhabitants / structures as a pretext for conducting middle eastern operations designed to "soften up" and condition nations in the gunsights of the nation state calling itself Israel's planned expansion and the need for demonstrations of foreign power to aid in the accomplishment of their plans. The multi-layer (3 level?) coverup and continuing mythology around this date has served to bolster the synthesized red-white-and-blue support for foreign entanglements and the sacrifice of American and foreign lives to the mystery religion Gods in order to sustain a presence in and the ability to purloin and control assets in the middle east.
The fact (?) that her PhD research assistant was murdered says a lot. Ditto for James Corbett apparently not wanting to touch it. I believe that was the case with Julian Assange as well. Bravo for having the courage to defend this brilliant woman. Did she discuss "the planes" at all?
You may find this interesting on the planes: https://old.bitchute.com/video/C6oekB67slJW/
Nothing on the planes, her focus was on the Twin Towers.
If you want to delve into the "planes", then look at the work of Mark Conlon - 9/11 Planes Research - https://911planesresearch.substack.com/
Is this the closest we’ll get to an apology from James Corbett with regards to the work of Dr Judy Wood?
Video: https://rumble.com/v5b7qel-james-corbett-apologises-for-911-disinformation.html
James Corbett didn't apologize. That was James Evan Pilato who did. Corbett talked around how there wasn't anything really new in the video, hardly any kind of apology.
I know we all have our own cognitive limitations, and I am extremely grateful for all the work Corbett has done down the years, but I do find it odd how he won't touch (i) the moon landings, (ii) Judy Wood, and (iii) evidence of nanotech in the shots. It is as though, for deep structural events, there is a line beyond which he will not go.
I don't blame James for not addressing this issue, either. Only so many hours in the day. HOWEVER!!!! He has not yet backtracked on 2 coveed points. First, he had on another podcaster who appears to me to be rather uneducated and the 2 of them chuckled over those crazy no virus people. Grrrrr. More importantly, he interviewed (if you could call it that) methias desmet and fell for his baloney, hook, line and sinker. 10x grrrrr.
Interviewing someone doesn't mean that you agree with them, and Corbett did challenge Desmet over the chapter in his book where he attacks "conspiracy theorists." But I hear what you're saying.
Yes, David, I know, but that would be what he challenged because he's a self described conspiracy theorist. Imho, he should have had Breggin on to counter. Or now that you've published and are becoming known, he should have you on. I called him on it via email and suggested he get one of you on to correct the record and of course he never answered. He has done very thorough work on other topics, but at times it seems to me, and especially with da coveed, his work can be rather shallow. I guess this one weakness really bothers me because 1. it's in my wheelhouse, 2. I think this is for all the marbles. Thank you for this conversation, btw. ;-)
I think that's a fair question. I'm grateful for many of TCR's posts during the past 15 or so years, but a comment I recently heard from someone I met over the weekend, David's research, and your above link make me realize there's much deeper/more relevant information available. The phrase, "Penetrate the ostensible," appear applicable to nearly everything I look at these days. Thanks for sharing!
You outdid yourself (and that's not easy) on this piece. It could be a book. I posted a link to it on Richard Gage's substack. We'll see if I get removed or comments!
You sharing your insights and quality of attention on any area is a gift to all of us. May this and all you do travel far and wide on the winds, like the puffy seeds of flowers floating by.
Your work and voice is important and extraordinary.
Thanks, Mary. I appreciate your kind words.
Here is my mix I put together from all my interactions with these “experts” putting their feet in their mouths in 2023 – They don’t like me much, lol
2h video interactions: https://rumble.com/v3xm981-911-truth-greatest-hits-2023-extended-cut.html
In 2023 Andrew Johnson squared off, face to face with Richard Gage.
Video: https://rumble.com/v47ixbo-911-truth-richard-gage-vs-andrew-johnson.html
Accompanying article;
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
I did a deep dive into cold fusion 12 years ago, visited several labs, looked at their data, and came away convinced that cold fusion technology is real. Whether it explains what Judy Wood documents is another question.
The "cold" in cold fusion refers to the fact that you don't need million degree temperatures to get it started. It does not mean that the energy is released without enormous heat.
My best guess is that advanced technology was used to bring down the Twin Towers, but that it was something more exotic than cold fusion.
There are many people who have reported the existence of whole underground cities, based on technologies that are not available to the rest of humanity.
https://mitteldorf.substack.com/p/what-is-a-breakaway-civilization
Thanks, Josh.
What is your evidence regarding the "enormous heat" involved in cold fusion? For example, this is how it is typically reported: "In 1989, chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann (Fig. 2) made headlines with claims that they had produced fusion at room temperature—“cold” fusion compared to the high temperatures the process was thought to require." https://undsci.berkeley.edu/lessons/pdfs/cold_fusion.pdf
I enjoyed your two pieces on cold fusion. For the benefit of readers, here are some quotes I picked out from them:
"Those who stand to lose if CF becomes viable are far more numerous and more powerful than a handful of scientists collecting billions of dollars in research contracts for hot fusion. There is plenty of money sunk in investments that would be worthless if cheap, dispersed CF cogeneration were a reality. Current value of oil in the ground is in the neighborhood of $100 trillion. The electric grid worldwide likewise is valued at tens of trillions of dollars. And the US dollar itself, since 1972, has been backed by Middle-East oil. So perhaps we don’t have to look far for candidate conspirators who have a stake in making sure that CF never comes to market."
"I think it plausible that CF technology holds the key to creating a megaton bomb with technology that could be managed by a basement hobbyist." (Or was it deployed in the basements?)
"A hypothetical small weapon based on cold fusion would be a graver temptation for Strangelovian military planners. It might be used deniably, without a significant radiation signature. It could be used near inhabited areas without creating a permanent hazard." (Or indeed in densely inhabited areas?)
In the paradigm endorsed by conventional science, the only way to get hydrogen to fuse to helium is to heat it to ~a million degrees. This happens inside a uranium bomb, which is the trigger for a hydrogen bomb. They've been trying to make it happen in a Tokomak for 60 years, with little success.
In the Pons-Fleischmann experiment, fusion was ignited at room temperature. Somehow, the palladium crystal was able to guide deuterium atoms to fuse together. The physics behind this is not well understood.
The energy that came out WAS in the form of heat. In the tiny experiment, with tiny amounts of deuterium fuel, they sometimes observed noticeable "excess heat" that raised the temperature of water flow. On one occasion, the heat from just milligrams of deuterium was enough to melt the lab table and excavate the concrete floor of the lab.
My point is that "cold fusion" is called that because it is not INITIALIZED by heat. But the heat created in any fusion reaction is enormous.
I agree that cold fusion may have been part of the recipe for destruction of the WTC towers. The best evidence for this is that CF creates much less radioactivity than hot fusion. But any CF device would be expected to create enormous heat energy, which seems inconsistent with what Judy Wood has shown us.
Thanks, Josh. This is very interesting. Food for thought!
This is a masterpiece. Thank you David.
Thank you, David, for you attention to this on yet another anniversary. I know people who still accept the official narrative.
It remains an ominous marker; the point in which the ramping up of global control was announced. With two decades plus behind us, the Patriot act and all the other mechanisms put in place to suspend or dismantle basic human rights - under the pretext of security - is laid bare.
The audacity of it - and getting away with it - likely gave confidence to the even larger operations planned - including the Covid pysop.
Jones clearly seems an infiltrator. We are always playing catch-up to the perception-managers.
Yes, democracy effectively ended on September 11, 2001, and we have been governed through various states of emergency ever since.
The molecular dissociation of the thermite & nuke theories
People are so easily led by perceived "experts".
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-controlled-demolition-of-thermite
You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline
D.E.P.S.
You'll be surprised to hear who the members are.
Read the article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional
How was concrete turned to dust? Here's a speculation:
Compare the way water is heated in a pot over a flame compared to water in a microwave oven. The flame is thousands of degrees, far hotter than boiling water, and that heat is transferred by conduction to the pot, by convection through the water. But in a microwave oven, the heat is suffused through the water, so the water heats much more uniformly.
A bomb is a localized source of energy, like a flame, and the damage must be transmitted through heat and pressure that spreads out from the bomb. What happened to the Twin Towers looks more like a microwave oven. The energy was injected uniformly through the concrete so that it pulverized homogeneously, without localized concentrations of heat.
Disclaimer: I know of no technology in the public domain that could do this. But DARPA has a great deal of technology that is not publicly disclosed, even if we don't speculate about a "breakaway civilization". It might work, like a microwave oven, with directed energy -- a beam of particles or radiation that penetrates through the concrete and is absorbed in the interior. Even more speculative, there might be some way to induce nuclear reactions (at a low level) within the concrete that injects the energy uniformly with less outside power required.
To me it does look as though there was a localized source of energy at the bottom centre of each tower. That would explain what Heinz Pommer calls the "fountain effect" of the destruction. Meanwhile, the upper 30 floor descended vertically straight into the path of the upwards blast and were dustified. The survivors on stairwell B, close to the bottom of the towers, would also be explained by being situated just below the "V" of the "fountain." A localized source of energy is also consistent with traditional nuclear weapons. I agree that DARPA classified technology seems like the most likely explanation.
In Judy Woods's book, she speculates about effects that John Hutchinson says he was able to create, using ideas borrowed from Tesla.
(Confusingly, there's also an unrelated Ian Hutchinson, who sought to debunk the possibility of cold fusion.)
Conventional physics has no explanation for the "Hutchinson effect." But reproducing his experiments might be a fruitful avenue to explore, both to learn new physics and also to develop revolutionary technologies.
Bob Greenyer - Iron Rich Microspheres due to intense magnetic vortexes and there is NO thermite, no little neutron bomb or jet fuel required.
Bob Greenyer from the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project discusses his ground-breaking work on exotic vacuum objects (EVOs), Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR or "Cold Fusion), the Hutchison Effect and Dr Judy Wood
Link: https://rumble.com/v53eodh-bob-greenyer-911-no-thermite-no-little-neutron-bomb-or-jet-fuel-required..html