Thank you for this. It needs to be spoken out loud. My deceased husband was an engineer and we followed the work of Architects & Engineers for Truth. I now realize we did so without fully questioning their thermite narrative. I wish my husband could now see Judy Wood's work. Much of Corbett's work I have respected and appreciated--but clearly for whatever reason, he has been had on this issue. I agree, it is essential it is questioned, and the more taboo to do so, the more revealing. You excel at navigating headwinds David Hughes. Thank you for your diligence and courage.
Thank you. Given the quality of Corbett's other work, I am genuinely surprised by his ongoing alliance with Gage. Surely he is smart enough to have figured out what Gage is by now.
in 2014 August i got an email from Arcitects and Engineers 9/11 Truth that a woman from California is on her way on a bicycle to arrive for the anniversary and is looking for accomodation. i was waiting at Christopher and West way to meet her and we biked down to ground zero. I had a painting studio in Dumbo, Brooklyn and an air mattress there. She told about her trip across the country, how she stopped at every village, hamlet, city, talked to sheriffs, firemen, police, people in the streets, homes, to tell them how the twin towers were demolished by explosives. I told her about Judy Wood and offered to show her book, Where did the Towers Go i had at home but she cut me short: “we don’t talk about that”. A couple of days later early morning i accompanied her to Penn Station where she took a train on her way back. I tried, but didn’t find her by email or phone again. That sentence of my guest stuck in my mind but only made sense much later as the Truth movement deteriorated.
Yes. and since you reminded me to push the reply button i want to tell you more: recently i re-connected and in a conversation with a friend in Hungary. She and her family arrived as visiting scholars September 8, 2001 to New York. Next day we went to the beach. Tuesday morning, on the 11th they called me, after having dropped their son at school they could see the tower burning from 6th Ave and 12th St. In this very recent exchange on fb messenger she writes, oh we’ll never know what happened to the towers. I leaned in. it became a soliloquy, i kept adding, no answer, then started to copy from that excruciating messenger format and surprise! lines like a quote from Judy’s book and others directly relating to the collapse did not copy! red lines in place of words persisted, had to kill them one by one and type in letter by letter. No more moderator spies, warnings “it goes against our community standards”. the algorithm does it. Still waiting for her reply.
a while back i posted my 2014 story on FB 9/11 forensic study group where Judy Wood also posts, for her to see. i think it was wiped off, can’t find it
It strains credulity to believe people like Carlson aren't part of the post-911 psyop. Did he not laugh hysterically while speaking at a "memorial" (yet another psyop) for his "friend" Charlie Kirk after Kirk was "brutally assassinated"? Has anyone seen the masonic hand signs, or photos of the Kabbalah red string around Carlson's wrist?
I'd only pay attention to Carlson as a barometer for the discernment level of the general public. A.I. has dutifully informed our satanic overlords that there's been a concerning rise in distrust of their narratives. In response, the overlords trot out their media whores to do damage control before distrust reaches critical mass.
You continue to do excellent work in that you strive for the truth. Please keep up the excellent work. Please continue to be the iconoclast that you are. We all want to believe that we are all striving for the truth. I don't know what the truth is yet. I keep scratching away for it as you do. Kind of akin to the Supreme Court justice who said "I don't have a good definition for pornography, but I know it when I see it." While that might be subjectively true it is objectively flawed. Most people don't understand the origin of the term flack. And they definitely don't understand the term "you know when you begin to receive flack that you are over the target." I believe I'm correct in saying that flack is an acronym for the actual gun that the Germans/Nazis used and that the acronym represents actual German descriptions of the weapon used please feel free speaking German as you do to share the letters in German for flack. Yes a bit of distraction forgive me………… You and JUDY et al are getting closer and closer to being over the target. Thank you for your courage.
WRT whether James Corbett is a limited hangout dude - Years ago I ran across some interesting writings from an intelligent free spirit (call him "Dead Surfer with Dog (DSwD)") who lived in a truck with his dog and surfed the world (hopefully this is enough clues for your excellent followers) whose name unfortunately escapes me. I didn't keep any links that I remember or could find. I also unfortunately didn't get a chance to read his writings when he was alive as he had somewhat recently passed away. He was evidently well loved as his website was kept intact, with someone even adding his memorial service notice. On a beach as I remember.
What's particularly relevant to this discussion is that some of DSwD's writings did a great job of revealing some "limited hangout" Team 2 players you would call them. DSwD did some really convincing take downs of some his subjects. Some of which were still up on his website at that time I saw it that someone was maintaining.
In one piece, one oddity was while talking about another limited hangout subject, DSwD had kind of a throw away line about how he had made the definitive case that Corbett was a Team 2 limited hangout guy. DSwD also provided a link to his Corbett review. While all the other links that I had tried from the DSwD's site worked, that was the only link that didn't work. I tried to Google it and got no luck either. It may mean something or it may not, but if it does it is interesting. DswD's analysis of Corbett might be worth a shot if anyone can find it. DSwD's work that I read was quite convincing.
Sorry I don't have more but I thought this might be of interest. That's my 2 pence worth. Probably overpriced.
I love Corbett also. I have learned a great deal from him. As noted below, I never found the linked article theoretically definitively proving he was limited hangout. I would like to see it but I do agree with you that there are certain areas James seems to avoid, like the great Judy Woods. I had noticed other comments, but again with no definitive proof, along the lines of Corbett is controlled.
While I would love definitive proof that Corbett is controlled or not, perhaps just asking the question is the critical action. The Deep State's motto is "Trust us and don't trust those crazy conspiracy theorists or yourself" (Ah...the golden oldies like "Don't Do Your Own Research"). Perhaps what's critical for the "Truth Movement" right now is just asking the question "Is James Corbett (or any Truther) a Limited Hangout?".
I don't know if you have had this feeling but I have had a Great Awakening as a result of Covid. I was pretty skeptical from a young age when I realized that most Wars are based on Government Lies and I thought "A Government that will lie you into War, will Lie you into Anything". It was not until Covid that I realized how I should always start with "Governments' lie about everything. Is this (any information, including "Truthers'") just another Government Lie?"
Given the Cosmic nature of the lies our history is based upon, starting with a "Trust Government" perspective is much more dangerous than "Trust No One". I would love to advise "Trust, but Verify". While a worthy goal, the simple fact is we may never be able to verify the truth because it is intentionally hidden from us by a deceptive and manipulative Government/Deep State.
Given these thoughts, I now tend to believe CIA Director William Casey's quote about 100% of what Americans' believe is lies. Let's start with that. Let's assume 100% of what the American (and British) people believe is lies and go from there. I suspect James would approve that statement.
Keep up the great work. Happy 2026! I'm sure 2026 is not what you thought it would be years ago when planning your academic life. Hope you and yours are doing ok in your new life.
As the old Polish proverb states "It's a long and winding road to Warsaw. But you won't be bored."
I also did a compound search using a line quoted by Vic Hughes, like this: ‘Allan C. Weisbecker "First let me point out that I’ve been doing a careful study of how misdirection/NLP works."’ This search produced https://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-miles-mathis-part-two/, which has the whole quote.
Brother Hughes - I was able to find the reference and the failed link is below.
As noted, I haven't seen the Corbett piece so I can't speak on it. I have read a fair amount of and by the primary subject of the article. Miles Mathis is an interesting character/British construct in his/its own right.
“First let me point out that I’ve been doing a careful study of how misdirection/NLP works. I’ve come to the conclusion that if you spot its continual or blatant use by someone, that someone must be considered to be a mole/shill/limited hangout, i.e., a government agent. My personal best example is my outing of James Corbett:
[addendum: The irony is that the ‘continual and blatant use’ of misdirection will apply to nearly everyone participating in the thread – about 20 people! The two CF ‘members’ who agreed with me contacted me via my website’s email; they went to some trouble to ‘agree’ without anyone else knowing – minus the NSA database, etc., of course]
If anyone disagrees with my take on Corbett, I am of course all ears. Okay, then. Back to Miles.”
There is an embedded link in the article to "outing of James Corbett" that brings me to: a "404 Error : Sorry we can't find the page you're looking for". If I go to the article and get this address which brings me back to this "https://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-le ... s-corbett/". this looks like the one above. Try it and see if it goes to the 404 Error. I can send you a picture on your email if you want to see the sad face on the 404 Error. I wonder if they redirected the address to what you are getting but they forget to change it in the embedded link. Strange.
I was able to post a photo of the 404 terror to your chat on the 4th Omniwar discussion. This really makes the analysis even more interesting. Sorry this wasted so mush of your time. Just watched your two hour interview on the 9/11 Scam. Excellent
I can send you a copy of the 404 error via email. I saved the quote in Apple Pages when I read it a while ago. I wonder if the Pages software kept the Corbett link that was later taken out of the online version. It certainly does look a bit odd.
Thank you for your honesty, David. James Corbett has been an outstanding proponent of 9/11 truth for decades, but he seems to fail to appreciate the "limited hangout" or "camp 2" tactics you have well described in the past. There is so much B.S. out there, it is refreshing to hear someone who "calls 'em as he sees 'em". I have read Judy Wood's book, and watched her video presentation, which was, last I looked, still up on YouTube. It is a remarkable piece of scholarship, and well presented. That it is virtually completely neglected by academia tells a lot about who is in charge these days. Nevertheless, the truth is great and it prevails. Magna est veritas et praevalet! Or what's a heaven for?
"Corbett says, 'As you'll recall, I wrote an article in November 2019 about the political turmoil then engulfing nations around the world…and mused on whether the fiery uprisings signaled that ‘the Old World Order of neoliberal globalism under Pax Americana is finally coming apart at the seams.’ … Of course, as we now know, that optimism was premature. The globalists always have tricks up their sleeve to fend off their demise. In this case, they chose to pull the scamdemic card and we all saw the immediate result: the fiery protests of 2019 came to a grinding halt at the beginning of 2020, when social distancing and locking ourselves in our own home were suddenly instituted as the prime civic virtues.'
This is really great stuff from Corbett, and it corresponds with what was apparently happening on the ground with the Yellow Vests, namely, that they were winning and the global governance apparatus decided to do something drastic, very drastic.
But then Corbett goes on to say that, while grand strategists like Brzezinski like to see the world as a grand chessboard where ordinary people are just pawns, us ordinary people shouldn’t get any ideas about grand strategy, and that we should just stick to the business of recreating the world from the ground up, free of controlling middle men.
That should be easy, right? We shouldn’t worry about legal and government structures built up over centuries of struggle for freedom? We should just plant gardens and raise livestock at our condos and to hell with all of the man’s evil infrastructure?
The fact is, we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Yes, we should work on decentralizing everything, but in parallel we must use the systems we already have to greater effect, especially legal systems."
Is James Corbett an Almost Unlimited Hangout Operation?
Essentially that Farrell acted in bad faith. Read it for yourself - you can download Andrew's books for free at checktheevidence.com. I forget if the Farrell info was in 9/11 - Finding The Truth or 9/11 Holding The Truth, but a simple search for "Farrell" in the two pdfs will quickly bring up the relevant information.
Hi David I had a look at both of Andrew Johnson's 9/11 pdf's regarding Joseph P Farrell, PhD and I find that Andrew Johnson has not provided the evidence to substantiate his many claims. He comes across a little petty and 'believe me because I say so' / 'trust me bro' in my opinion.
First, in 'Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks and Secret Sorcery' (2016) by Joseph P Farrell PhD and published by Adventures Unlimited Press (and not Feral House) cites Dr Judy Wood and on the back cover reads "...He [Joseph P Farrell] says that the twin towers were downed by the force of an exotic energy weapon, one similar to the Tesla energy weapon suggested by Dr. Judy Wood ..." and on page 200 references Judy Wood, PhD 'Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 9/11'.
In '9/11 Holding The Truth' Andrew Johnson writes: "The first “others,” I would argue, should be those in the research community – such as Steve Bassett, Joseph Farrell and Ian R Crane. However, they have consistently “passed” on opportunities to speak about the evidence 20."
When I clicked on Andrew's endnote "20" I reasonably expected to see the evidence that 'Steve Bassett, Joseph Farrell and Ian R Crane have consistently “passed” on opportunities to speak about the evidence' BUT got nothing of the sort, INSTEAD the link brought me to "Jim Marrs in Toronto (22-06-2014) | Conspiracy Culture" youtube video where Jim Marrs is asked a question about Directed Energy Weapons and says he, Jim Marr, wrote about Dr Judy Wood in 'The Terror Conspiracy Revisited: What Really Happened on 9/11...' and Jim Marr thinks that Dr Judy Wood is on to something. So there is zero evidence from Andrew to substantiate his claims against Steve Bassett, Joseph Farrell and Ian R Crane.
Further Andrew Johnson: "In April 2017 in an interview with "Sage Monitor", Farrell was heard to mimic / copy the language of Dr Judy Woods description of the destruction of WTC 211." When I clicked on to endnote 211, I got "this video isn't available anymore". So again there is zero evidence for his claims. What Andrew is alleging as 'mimic' I really have questions.
Also, Andrew makes further unsubstantiated claims regarding Joseph P Farrell and Judy Wood PhD's book, allegedly acting in bad faith and the then publisher Feral House. It seems that Joseph P Farrell, PhD left Feral House publishing for Adventures Unlimited Press sometime before 2014. Only 6 of Joseph P Farrell's books were published at Feral House and he has spoken about issues with publishers in the past.
As a researcher, I value the work of Joseph P Farrell including his books, his quarterly wrap ups with Catherine Austin Fitts at the Solari Report, his blogs at Giza Death Star https://gizadeathstar.com/ and especially his work on the hidden system of finance, exotic technologies and alterative history. I also value the work of Dr Judy Wood - the two are not mutually exclusive in my mind.
I think the key point I was remembering is the one below:
"So, to clarify the point, JP Farrell worked with Dr Judy Wood, for several months with the material used in Where Did the Towers Go? However, it seemed he then became involved in an operation to remove content from the book and to delay or prevent the publication of the book. (Farrell wanted to remove much of the material relating to John Hutchison’s research and the Hurricane Erin data. Also see the article “Is Richard Hoagland on a Dark Mission” in 9/11 Finding the Truth. I did not name Farrell in that article – but it was Farrell who was responsible for taking the WDTTG manuscript to Ferral House publishers.) During the editing, Farrell wanted to remove photos of the “toasted cars” and he made several subtle changes to the text, which were unnecessary. He had detailed knowledge of the text – yet he rarely if ever talks about the details of what happened to the WTC, except, perhaps, to fit it in with his own “storytelling” about a possible “operation within an operation.” Suffice it to say, that Farrell has not been honest about his dealings with the WDTTG material and has also tried to “muddle things up” in his presentations."
You say that Johnson's claims here unsubstantiated, but my understanding is that he has them straight from Wood (not Woods) herself.
Farrell's Vipers of Venice appeared with Feral House in October 2013. His involvement with Where Did The Towers Go? relates to 2010/2011. The timeline is consistent with Johnson's account.
In terms of "copying the language" of Wood, Johnson explains what he means in his book. He is talking about Wood's "banana peeling" metaphor, which Farrell appropriated. In addition, Johnson writes:
"The reference to 'count with his hands' also seems to mimic what Dr Wood has said a few times in relation to clapping your hands quickly to see if you can match the speed at which the floors of the building are turning to dust."
My comment related only to Farrell, not Bassett or Crane.
Therefore, I think Johnson's main point stands. Farrell's role in the publication of WDTTG is suspicious. Despite borrowing from Wood's key ideas, he does not appear to present them faithfully.
I am not very familiar with Farrell's work, but my interest in Nazi connections to the present did prompt me to look briefly at his "Nazi international" and "operation within an operation" hypothesis.
I did not find it convincing, but that is another matter.
Thank you for your reply. My name is Alisa with one 's'.
I see you have quoted the two paragraphs from page 85 Andrew Johnson's pdf/book ‘9/11: Holding the Truth’ (2017) regarding Joseph P Farrell. Andrew Johnson has provided No evidence to substantiate his claims about Joseph P Farrell made on page 85- not a single citation, not a single endnote and not a single footnote. Again, these are straight up unsubstantiated claims in 'Trust me bro' style by Andrew Johnson.
David, how can it be your “understanding” that Andrew has statements or evidence “straight from Wood herself” regarding Joseph P Farrell, when Andrew Johnson produces NO evidence, not one reference, not one mention, not one to footnote to that effect?
David, you know as a researcher, if you make a claim, then you have to produce the evidence to back it up. Instead it seems to me that Andrew Johnson is acting like the US government - making wild claims with no evidence to back them up.
David it is illogical and irrational to state: “Therefore, I think Johnson's main point stands. Farrell's role in the publication of WDTTG is suspicious. Despite borrowing from Wood's key ideas, he does not appear to present them faithfully.”
How can ‘Andrew Johnson’s main point stand’ when it is not based on any evidence - only Andrew’s own conjecture? Andrew Johnston has produced no evidence that Joseph P Farrell was even involved. Not one jot.
In my opinion, Andrew’s books '9/11: Finding the Truth' (2012) and ‘9/11: Holding the Truth’ (2017) are not credible “research” – as they both seem to follow a predictable pattern –
Andrew complains of ‘victimisation’ and then makes unsubstantiated accusations and claims against other researchers and never backs up his claims. I have seen this same pattern used by others many times before.
I hope you take this in the spirit of charity that it is written, as I know it will not be easy to hear because, you have promoted these books – unnecessarily in my opinion - on the Solari Report and elsewhere, but the truth is the truth. I hope you will be able to see the truth and the pattern too.
As a researcher, I value the work and books of Joseph P Farrell, PhD and I value the work and book of Dr Judy Wood – the two are not mutually exclusive in my mind.
David I think you would do well to acquaint yourself with the works of Joseph P Farrell, PhD. Perhaps ‘Microcosm and Medium: The Cosmic Implications and Agenda of Mind Control Technologies’ (2018)? I highly recommend it, and Catherine Austin Fitts has written a book review on the Solari Report:
“With ‘Microcosm and Medium’, Dr. Farrell has written the best book I have read yet on the mind control being used to manipulate you and me. More than once, I had to put the book down to digest an entirely new insight. I was amazed to realize how much there was about this subject that I had not yet understood. Looking back over the descent of American politics and communities into madness, I gained new perspectives on how it happened…” https://solari.com/the-cosmic-implications-of-mind-control-with-dr-joseph-farrell/
The physical copy's a must[I own your book]. That Dr. Farrell acted in bad faith, is too out of chaeacter for him. I'm left with simply putting down to...
Lost in translation/communication.
Your character is unquestionable as well.
Sometimes, the answer is lost in murky misunderstanding.
I put the above in quotes, because the "sciences" are once again going "Back-To-the-Future". You can find some writing of Church Fathers going way back..., centuries, describing to a "t" quantum mechanics.
Of course, today the GRIN technologies are all bleeding into one[so-to-speak.
ALL THAT to say...?
Well, as YOU ewell know...?
"There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio,
than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
AND THAT, of course, in cludes me.
I see your point.
Yet, the real point is that ALL may be right and wrong AT the same time.
Good question, why is Corbett doing this? Gage, may be military intelligence. There is some testimony about Gage, handling a chemist who retired from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and was considering doing conferences on 9-11, similar to Judy Wood. Obviously those conferences never happened, and the chemist is dead, now. I think his name was Peter Gregg, but I'm getting old, and my memory is wavering. If you need the chemists name, I can dig around and get his name and a link to the testimony about Gage. The web of liars, grifters, and those "in on it" is vast.
The entire AE911T/IC911J operation is obviously a military psy-op in my view. It purpose, from the very beginning, has been to exclude the use of classified military technology from public discussion and debate.
The web is indeed vast. I suspect that the large majority of the alternative media is not what it appears to be, and that most of it has been infiltrated by state power.
I agree. I forgot who said it, but “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves”. I do apologize for my memory on all these characters. If you need the exact name of the chemist who worked at Lawrence Livermore, where Gage, moved into his house out in California for an entire year, basically holding him hostage, until the guy died. I can dig up the testimony of the chemists personal friend that explains who the chemist was, and what went down with Gage, if you are interested. Maybe someday, you could write a book about all these people and their connections. If I had good writing and language skills, like you, I would do it. Also, in case you are interested, over here in America, there are many job openings with the title Role Player Surveillance ($20-$64). So this sort of activity (alt media, false flags etc) is not stopping any time soon.
David Gregg was the chemist at Lawrence Livermore (weapons) national Laboratory. Death announcement https://www.llnl.gov/community-education/employee-retirement-resources/in-memoriam/david-w-gregg Irene Gage is mentioned in this article. I have not been able to find the video testimony of David’s long time friend, where he stated Richard Gage from 9-11 truth was in David Greggs house etc. When I was trying to search for a connection between Irene and Richard via, articles, wiki. I could not find one. Oddly at the top of the search is that AI generated read out. It said Irene’s California address was connected to the 911 Architects and Engineers, address. Its the same address. (Yet no direct connection) AI is stupid, but whatever. I attached the video, that I did find, where David’s friend, a bank auditor located in California, does talk about knowing David. I know this is not hard evidence, but I can’t spend a lot of time starring at a computer screen, it makes me feel sick, and gives me a headache. I will search for the exact video, next week. https://rumble.com/v38xezg-charlie-miles-maddox-manson-20-and-his-bride-rosalie-willis15..html?e9s=src_v1_wh&playlist_id=watch-history
h ttps://search.brave.com/search?q=Richard+and+Irene+Gage&source=desktop&summary=1&conversation=76fa66b35268d38938aca3
9/11 Revisionist clipped the story about Dave Gregg, the Livermore Laboratory retiree (https://rumble.com/v6s67hn-richard-gage-the-spook-and-red-herring.html), from a Juxtaposition1 Substack article, 9/11 Revisionist doesn't remember which. Gage commented, "Almost all of what he says here is lie [sic]. Dave was my mothers' [sic] boyfriend. Listen to the evidence and decide for yourself the truth about 9/11: https://rumble.com/v6x8u74-australiaone-party-truth-about-911-richard-gage-aia-7-august-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a". The link has nothing to do with Gregg or the story. I asked in a following comment, "It sounds pretty credible to me – at least I couldn't make anything like this up. So what in his story is true and what isn't?" There was no reply. Earlier today I asked again, "I'm still waiting for a reply to my question from a week ago: So what in his story is true and what isn't?" Still no reply.
There was apparently a court case to start shortly in the US, private citizen suing US Govt and supposedly naming hundreds of people involved in the 9/11 event. I thought this might be something about it, as Tucker Carlson was part of it I think. Heard on an interview with the group Doctors for Medical Ethics International, which seems to be mainly Americans. Have you heard anything about this court case David?
The problem we have is that we cannot trust the courts.
The only actual court cases that the "truth movement" has launched in relation to "9/11" were the Qui Tam cases by Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds in 2007. They got thrown out for no good reason.
Good article. I've read the Robinson/Walter article and watched the five-part Carlson series and "The Lost Art of 'Yes, And . . .'", so I know what you're talking about. I'm a Corbett subscriber and am forwarding this to him, though I assume he's already aware of it.
Thank you for this. It needs to be spoken out loud. My deceased husband was an engineer and we followed the work of Architects & Engineers for Truth. I now realize we did so without fully questioning their thermite narrative. I wish my husband could now see Judy Wood's work. Much of Corbett's work I have respected and appreciated--but clearly for whatever reason, he has been had on this issue. I agree, it is essential it is questioned, and the more taboo to do so, the more revealing. You excel at navigating headwinds David Hughes. Thank you for your diligence and courage.
Thank you. Given the quality of Corbett's other work, I am genuinely surprised by his ongoing alliance with Gage. Surely he is smart enough to have figured out what Gage is by now.
Your husband sees now the Truth, probably better than most of us. Be well.
in 2014 August i got an email from Arcitects and Engineers 9/11 Truth that a woman from California is on her way on a bicycle to arrive for the anniversary and is looking for accomodation. i was waiting at Christopher and West way to meet her and we biked down to ground zero. I had a painting studio in Dumbo, Brooklyn and an air mattress there. She told about her trip across the country, how she stopped at every village, hamlet, city, talked to sheriffs, firemen, police, people in the streets, homes, to tell them how the twin towers were demolished by explosives. I told her about Judy Wood and offered to show her book, Where did the Towers Go i had at home but she cut me short: “we don’t talk about that”. A couple of days later early morning i accompanied her to Penn Station where she took a train on her way back. I tried, but didn’t find her by email or phone again. That sentence of my guest stuck in my mind but only made sense much later as the Truth movement deteriorated.
"We don't talk about that."
That is the whole point of the "9/11 truth movement," isn't it?
Yes. and since you reminded me to push the reply button i want to tell you more: recently i re-connected and in a conversation with a friend in Hungary. She and her family arrived as visiting scholars September 8, 2001 to New York. Next day we went to the beach. Tuesday morning, on the 11th they called me, after having dropped their son at school they could see the tower burning from 6th Ave and 12th St. In this very recent exchange on fb messenger she writes, oh we’ll never know what happened to the towers. I leaned in. it became a soliloquy, i kept adding, no answer, then started to copy from that excruciating messenger format and surprise! lines like a quote from Judy’s book and others directly relating to the collapse did not copy! red lines in place of words persisted, had to kill them one by one and type in letter by letter. No more moderator spies, warnings “it goes against our community standards”. the algorithm does it. Still waiting for her reply.
a while back i posted my 2014 story on FB 9/11 forensic study group where Judy Wood also posts, for her to see. i think it was wiped off, can’t find it
Welcome to the technocratic future...
..., where scholars, poets, former free spirits, even revolutionaries, turn away from reality.
Loved it!
Corbett, Carlson, and others fulfill the role of what is termed?
GATEKEEPERS.
Well done!
It strains credulity to believe people like Carlson aren't part of the post-911 psyop. Did he not laugh hysterically while speaking at a "memorial" (yet another psyop) for his "friend" Charlie Kirk after Kirk was "brutally assassinated"? Has anyone seen the masonic hand signs, or photos of the Kabbalah red string around Carlson's wrist?
I'd only pay attention to Carlson as a barometer for the discernment level of the general public. A.I. has dutifully informed our satanic overlords that there's been a concerning rise in distrust of their narratives. In response, the overlords trot out their media whores to do damage control before distrust reaches critical mass.
You continue to do excellent work in that you strive for the truth. Please keep up the excellent work. Please continue to be the iconoclast that you are. We all want to believe that we are all striving for the truth. I don't know what the truth is yet. I keep scratching away for it as you do. Kind of akin to the Supreme Court justice who said "I don't have a good definition for pornography, but I know it when I see it." While that might be subjectively true it is objectively flawed. Most people don't understand the origin of the term flack. And they definitely don't understand the term "you know when you begin to receive flack that you are over the target." I believe I'm correct in saying that flack is an acronym for the actual gun that the Germans/Nazis used and that the acronym represents actual German descriptions of the weapon used please feel free speaking German as you do to share the letters in German for flack. Yes a bit of distraction forgive me………… You and JUDY et al are getting closer and closer to being over the target. Thank you for your courage.
Yes, I imagine there will be a hit piece or two against me for this. If that happens, it will only confirm the validity of my argument.
Amen brother and God bless you.
WRT whether James Corbett is a limited hangout dude - Years ago I ran across some interesting writings from an intelligent free spirit (call him "Dead Surfer with Dog (DSwD)") who lived in a truck with his dog and surfed the world (hopefully this is enough clues for your excellent followers) whose name unfortunately escapes me. I didn't keep any links that I remember or could find. I also unfortunately didn't get a chance to read his writings when he was alive as he had somewhat recently passed away. He was evidently well loved as his website was kept intact, with someone even adding his memorial service notice. On a beach as I remember.
What's particularly relevant to this discussion is that some of DSwD's writings did a great job of revealing some "limited hangout" Team 2 players you would call them. DSwD did some really convincing take downs of some his subjects. Some of which were still up on his website at that time I saw it that someone was maintaining.
In one piece, one oddity was while talking about another limited hangout subject, DSwD had kind of a throw away line about how he had made the definitive case that Corbett was a Team 2 limited hangout guy. DSwD also provided a link to his Corbett review. While all the other links that I had tried from the DSwD's site worked, that was the only link that didn't work. I tried to Google it and got no luck either. It may mean something or it may not, but if it does it is interesting. DswD's analysis of Corbett might be worth a shot if anyone can find it. DSwD's work that I read was quite convincing.
Sorry I don't have more but I thought this might be of interest. That's my 2 pence worth. Probably overpriced.
Personally I love Corbett for everything he has done. I think a large amount of respect is due.
I just don't understand his enduring loyalty to shady characters like Gage.
It wouldn't be hard for him to explain it, but he never goes there. Much as he never addresses the findings of Judy Wood.
Why not?
I love Corbett also. I have learned a great deal from him. As noted below, I never found the linked article theoretically definitively proving he was limited hangout. I would like to see it but I do agree with you that there are certain areas James seems to avoid, like the great Judy Woods. I had noticed other comments, but again with no definitive proof, along the lines of Corbett is controlled.
While I would love definitive proof that Corbett is controlled or not, perhaps just asking the question is the critical action. The Deep State's motto is "Trust us and don't trust those crazy conspiracy theorists or yourself" (Ah...the golden oldies like "Don't Do Your Own Research"). Perhaps what's critical for the "Truth Movement" right now is just asking the question "Is James Corbett (or any Truther) a Limited Hangout?".
I don't know if you have had this feeling but I have had a Great Awakening as a result of Covid. I was pretty skeptical from a young age when I realized that most Wars are based on Government Lies and I thought "A Government that will lie you into War, will Lie you into Anything". It was not until Covid that I realized how I should always start with "Governments' lie about everything. Is this (any information, including "Truthers'") just another Government Lie?"
Given the Cosmic nature of the lies our history is based upon, starting with a "Trust Government" perspective is much more dangerous than "Trust No One". I would love to advise "Trust, but Verify". While a worthy goal, the simple fact is we may never be able to verify the truth because it is intentionally hidden from us by a deceptive and manipulative Government/Deep State.
Given these thoughts, I now tend to believe CIA Director William Casey's quote about 100% of what Americans' believe is lies. Let's start with that. Let's assume 100% of what the American (and British) people believe is lies and go from there. I suspect James would approve that statement.
Keep up the great work. Happy 2026! I'm sure 2026 is not what you thought it would be years ago when planning your academic life. Hope you and yours are doing ok in your new life.
As the old Polish proverb states "It's a long and winding road to Warsaw. But you won't be bored."
Thanks, Vic.
The entire control system is based on Big Lies (and other lies) in my opinion.
If anyone can track down the relevant information, please let us know.
I did a compound search in Google: “Allan C. Weisbecker James Corbett”, which produced the links: https://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-james-corbett/, https://blog.banditobooks.com/corbett-flat-out-busted/. I believe they are what you’re looking for.
I also did a compound search using a line quoted by Vic Hughes, like this: ‘Allan C. Weisbecker "First let me point out that I’ve been doing a careful study of how misdirection/NLP works."’ This search produced https://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-miles-mathis-part-two/, which has the whole quote.
Brother Hughes - I was able to find the reference and the failed link is below.
As noted, I haven't seen the Corbett piece so I can't speak on it. I have read a fair amount of and by the primary subject of the article. Miles Mathis is an interesting character/British construct in his/its own right.
"An Open Letter To Miles Mathis, Part Two
by Allan Weisbecker on March 21, 2017 in Blog
Hi folks (plus ‘Miles,’ whoever ya’ll are),
Page not found – Allan C. Weisbecker
"https://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-le ... s-corbett/"
.......
“First let me point out that I’ve been doing a careful study of how misdirection/NLP works. I’ve come to the conclusion that if you spot its continual or blatant use by someone, that someone must be considered to be a mole/shill/limited hangout, i.e., a government agent. My personal best example is my outing of James Corbett:
[addendum: The irony is that the ‘continual and blatant use’ of misdirection will apply to nearly everyone participating in the thread – about 20 people! The two CF ‘members’ who agreed with me contacted me via my website’s email; they went to some trouble to ‘agree’ without anyone else knowing – minus the NSA database, etc., of course]
If anyone disagrees with my take on Corbett, I am of course all ears. Okay, then. Back to Miles.”
That link does open, but there is no mention of James Corbett.
There is an embedded link in the article to "outing of James Corbett" that brings me to: a "404 Error : Sorry we can't find the page you're looking for". If I go to the article and get this address which brings me back to this "https://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-le ... s-corbett/". this looks like the one above. Try it and see if it goes to the 404 Error. I can send you a picture on your email if you want to see the sad face on the 404 Error. I wonder if they redirected the address to what you are getting but they forget to change it in the embedded link. Strange.
It opens for me, but still nothing about Corbett.
I was able to post a photo of the 404 terror to your chat on the 4th Omniwar discussion. This really makes the analysis even more interesting. Sorry this wasted so mush of your time. Just watched your two hour interview on the 9/11 Scam. Excellent
I can send you a copy of the 404 error via email. I saved the quote in Apple Pages when I read it a while ago. I wonder if the Pages software kept the Corbett link that was later taken out of the online version. It certainly does look a bit odd.
See my reply to David Hughes.
Thank you for your honesty, David. James Corbett has been an outstanding proponent of 9/11 truth for decades, but he seems to fail to appreciate the "limited hangout" or "camp 2" tactics you have well described in the past. There is so much B.S. out there, it is refreshing to hear someone who "calls 'em as he sees 'em". I have read Judy Wood's book, and watched her video presentation, which was, last I looked, still up on YouTube. It is a remarkable piece of scholarship, and well presented. That it is virtually completely neglected by academia tells a lot about who is in charge these days. Nevertheless, the truth is great and it prevails. Magna est veritas et praevalet! Or what's a heaven for?
Well said, Mark!
A nod to Robert Browning for the last one!
What you're saying about 9/11 makes sense to me.
Re: James Corbett:
"Corbett says, 'As you'll recall, I wrote an article in November 2019 about the political turmoil then engulfing nations around the world…and mused on whether the fiery uprisings signaled that ‘the Old World Order of neoliberal globalism under Pax Americana is finally coming apart at the seams.’ … Of course, as we now know, that optimism was premature. The globalists always have tricks up their sleeve to fend off their demise. In this case, they chose to pull the scamdemic card and we all saw the immediate result: the fiery protests of 2019 came to a grinding halt at the beginning of 2020, when social distancing and locking ourselves in our own home were suddenly instituted as the prime civic virtues.'
This is really great stuff from Corbett, and it corresponds with what was apparently happening on the ground with the Yellow Vests, namely, that they were winning and the global governance apparatus decided to do something drastic, very drastic.
But then Corbett goes on to say that, while grand strategists like Brzezinski like to see the world as a grand chessboard where ordinary people are just pawns, us ordinary people shouldn’t get any ideas about grand strategy, and that we should just stick to the business of recreating the world from the ground up, free of controlling middle men.
That should be easy, right? We shouldn’t worry about legal and government structures built up over centuries of struggle for freedom? We should just plant gardens and raise livestock at our condos and to hell with all of the man’s evil infrastructure?
The fact is, we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Yes, we should work on decentralizing everything, but in parallel we must use the systems we already have to greater effect, especially legal systems."
Is James Corbett an Almost Unlimited Hangout Operation?
Just sayin' he sounds like it sometimes
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/is-james-corbett-an-almost-unlimited
It's a painful question.
Corbett has done an unbelievable amount of good.
But I don't understand why he continues to ally himself with proven liars like Gage.
"Resistance Pathways: Toward Information Sovereignty
Countering this system requires:
Legislative Action: Reinstating Smith-Mundt's domestic firewall via the "Stop Domestic Propaganda Act" (proposed 2021)."
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act and the Weaponization of Information: How U.S. Propaganda Was Turned Inward
From Cold War Shield to Domestic Thought Control: The Secret Legalization of Government Mind Warfare Against Americans
https://futuredude.substack.com/p/the-smith-mundt-modernization-act
Maybe he's a wolf in sheep's clothing, I don't know.
A wolf in sheep's clothing hidden in plain sight
The Fabian Society, then and now
https://unexpectedturns.substack.com/p/a-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing
Proverbs 20:17 Bread of deceit is sweet to a man; but afterwards his mouth shall be filled with gravel.
They know it works.
AND for now, that's all that matters.
[in their viewpoint].
I'm just saying, "they". care more on results[than the hows & wnys].
The real target is Technocracy.
AND your work is...
SPOT ON!
The BEST I've come across!
I think there was a moon landing.
But , that YOU question it?
Means, your my kind of researcher!!!
The exact kind it takes...
To BLOW-AWAY! the smoke & mirrors; being placed - all over,Hell & Back!
The best book on the 9/11 subject matter goes deep into several related areas.
The 9/11 operation was actually penetrated at a deeper level.
Dr. Farrell's work, covers many unknown aspects of the planned operation.
"Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Socery:
The Fascist International, 9/11, and Penetrated Operations
By Joseph P Farrel May, 16, 2016
You should check what Andrew Johnson has to say about Farrell in relation to Judy Wood.
What did he say?
Essentially that Farrell acted in bad faith. Read it for yourself - you can download Andrew's books for free at checktheevidence.com. I forget if the Farrell info was in 9/11 - Finding The Truth or 9/11 Holding The Truth, but a simple search for "Farrell" in the two pdfs will quickly bring up the relevant information.
Hi David I had a look at both of Andrew Johnson's 9/11 pdf's regarding Joseph P Farrell, PhD and I find that Andrew Johnson has not provided the evidence to substantiate his many claims. He comes across a little petty and 'believe me because I say so' / 'trust me bro' in my opinion.
First, in 'Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks and Secret Sorcery' (2016) by Joseph P Farrell PhD and published by Adventures Unlimited Press (and not Feral House) cites Dr Judy Wood and on the back cover reads "...He [Joseph P Farrell] says that the twin towers were downed by the force of an exotic energy weapon, one similar to the Tesla energy weapon suggested by Dr. Judy Wood ..." and on page 200 references Judy Wood, PhD 'Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology on 9/11'.
In '9/11 Holding The Truth' Andrew Johnson writes: "The first “others,” I would argue, should be those in the research community – such as Steve Bassett, Joseph Farrell and Ian R Crane. However, they have consistently “passed” on opportunities to speak about the evidence 20."
When I clicked on Andrew's endnote "20" I reasonably expected to see the evidence that 'Steve Bassett, Joseph Farrell and Ian R Crane have consistently “passed” on opportunities to speak about the evidence' BUT got nothing of the sort, INSTEAD the link brought me to "Jim Marrs in Toronto (22-06-2014) | Conspiracy Culture" youtube video where Jim Marrs is asked a question about Directed Energy Weapons and says he, Jim Marr, wrote about Dr Judy Wood in 'The Terror Conspiracy Revisited: What Really Happened on 9/11...' and Jim Marr thinks that Dr Judy Wood is on to something. So there is zero evidence from Andrew to substantiate his claims against Steve Bassett, Joseph Farrell and Ian R Crane.
Further Andrew Johnson: "In April 2017 in an interview with "Sage Monitor", Farrell was heard to mimic / copy the language of Dr Judy Woods description of the destruction of WTC 211." When I clicked on to endnote 211, I got "this video isn't available anymore". So again there is zero evidence for his claims. What Andrew is alleging as 'mimic' I really have questions.
Also, Andrew makes further unsubstantiated claims regarding Joseph P Farrell and Judy Wood PhD's book, allegedly acting in bad faith and the then publisher Feral House. It seems that Joseph P Farrell, PhD left Feral House publishing for Adventures Unlimited Press sometime before 2014. Only 6 of Joseph P Farrell's books were published at Feral House and he has spoken about issues with publishers in the past.
As a researcher, I value the work of Joseph P Farrell including his books, his quarterly wrap ups with Catherine Austin Fitts at the Solari Report, his blogs at Giza Death Star https://gizadeathstar.com/ and especially his work on the hidden system of finance, exotic technologies and alterative history. I also value the work of Dr Judy Wood - the two are not mutually exclusive in my mind.
Thanks for looking into this, Alissa.
I think the key point I was remembering is the one below:
"So, to clarify the point, JP Farrell worked with Dr Judy Wood, for several months with the material used in Where Did the Towers Go? However, it seemed he then became involved in an operation to remove content from the book and to delay or prevent the publication of the book. (Farrell wanted to remove much of the material relating to John Hutchison’s research and the Hurricane Erin data. Also see the article “Is Richard Hoagland on a Dark Mission” in 9/11 Finding the Truth. I did not name Farrell in that article – but it was Farrell who was responsible for taking the WDTTG manuscript to Ferral House publishers.) During the editing, Farrell wanted to remove photos of the “toasted cars” and he made several subtle changes to the text, which were unnecessary. He had detailed knowledge of the text – yet he rarely if ever talks about the details of what happened to the WTC, except, perhaps, to fit it in with his own “storytelling” about a possible “operation within an operation.” Suffice it to say, that Farrell has not been honest about his dealings with the WDTTG material and has also tried to “muddle things up” in his presentations."
You say that Johnson's claims here unsubstantiated, but my understanding is that he has them straight from Wood (not Woods) herself.
Farrell's Vipers of Venice appeared with Feral House in October 2013. His involvement with Where Did The Towers Go? relates to 2010/2011. The timeline is consistent with Johnson's account.
In terms of "copying the language" of Wood, Johnson explains what he means in his book. He is talking about Wood's "banana peeling" metaphor, which Farrell appropriated. In addition, Johnson writes:
"The reference to 'count with his hands' also seems to mimic what Dr Wood has said a few times in relation to clapping your hands quickly to see if you can match the speed at which the floors of the building are turning to dust."
My comment related only to Farrell, not Bassett or Crane.
Therefore, I think Johnson's main point stands. Farrell's role in the publication of WDTTG is suspicious. Despite borrowing from Wood's key ideas, he does not appear to present them faithfully.
I am not very familiar with Farrell's work, but my interest in Nazi connections to the present did prompt me to look briefly at his "Nazi international" and "operation within an operation" hypothesis.
I did not find it convincing, but that is another matter.
Hi David
Thank you for your reply. My name is Alisa with one 's'.
I see you have quoted the two paragraphs from page 85 Andrew Johnson's pdf/book ‘9/11: Holding the Truth’ (2017) regarding Joseph P Farrell. Andrew Johnson has provided No evidence to substantiate his claims about Joseph P Farrell made on page 85- not a single citation, not a single endnote and not a single footnote. Again, these are straight up unsubstantiated claims in 'Trust me bro' style by Andrew Johnson.
David, how can it be your “understanding” that Andrew has statements or evidence “straight from Wood herself” regarding Joseph P Farrell, when Andrew Johnson produces NO evidence, not one reference, not one mention, not one to footnote to that effect?
David, you know as a researcher, if you make a claim, then you have to produce the evidence to back it up. Instead it seems to me that Andrew Johnson is acting like the US government - making wild claims with no evidence to back them up.
David it is illogical and irrational to state: “Therefore, I think Johnson's main point stands. Farrell's role in the publication of WDTTG is suspicious. Despite borrowing from Wood's key ideas, he does not appear to present them faithfully.”
How can ‘Andrew Johnson’s main point stand’ when it is not based on any evidence - only Andrew’s own conjecture? Andrew Johnston has produced no evidence that Joseph P Farrell was even involved. Not one jot.
In my opinion, Andrew’s books '9/11: Finding the Truth' (2012) and ‘9/11: Holding the Truth’ (2017) are not credible “research” – as they both seem to follow a predictable pattern –
Andrew complains of ‘victimisation’ and then makes unsubstantiated accusations and claims against other researchers and never backs up his claims. I have seen this same pattern used by others many times before.
I hope you take this in the spirit of charity that it is written, as I know it will not be easy to hear because, you have promoted these books – unnecessarily in my opinion - on the Solari Report and elsewhere, but the truth is the truth. I hope you will be able to see the truth and the pattern too.
As a researcher, I value the work and books of Joseph P Farrell, PhD and I value the work and book of Dr Judy Wood – the two are not mutually exclusive in my mind.
David I think you would do well to acquaint yourself with the works of Joseph P Farrell, PhD. Perhaps ‘Microcosm and Medium: The Cosmic Implications and Agenda of Mind Control Technologies’ (2018)? I highly recommend it, and Catherine Austin Fitts has written a book review on the Solari Report:
“With ‘Microcosm and Medium’, Dr. Farrell has written the best book I have read yet on the mind control being used to manipulate you and me. More than once, I had to put the book down to digest an entirely new insight. I was amazed to realize how much there was about this subject that I had not yet understood. Looking back over the descent of American politics and communities into madness, I gained new perspectives on how it happened…” https://solari.com/the-cosmic-implications-of-mind-control-with-dr-joseph-farrell/
Yours in pure truth,
Alisa.
The physical copy's a must[I own your book]. That Dr. Farrell acted in bad faith, is too out of chaeacter for him. I'm left with simply putting down to...
Lost in translation/communication.
Your character is unquestionable as well.
Sometimes, the answer is lost in murky misunderstanding.
I assume, goodwill on both partys.
Knowing one, not the other.
The ooppsite of that must have work::
Guilt by Association.
Dr. Farrell is on the cutting edge of "physics".
I put the above in quotes, because the "sciences" are once again going "Back-To-the-Future". You can find some writing of Church Fathers going way back..., centuries, describing to a "t" quantum mechanics.
Of course, today the GRIN technologies are all bleeding into one[so-to-speak.
ALL THAT to say...?
Well, as YOU ewell know...?
"There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio,
than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
AND THAT, of course, in cludes me.
I see your point.
Yet, the real point is that ALL may be right and wrong AT the same time.
In other words...
At present, there are no definitive answers.
AND, if thruth be known...?
The pertrators, were surprised, as well!
AND, "they" don't know!
Good question, why is Corbett doing this? Gage, may be military intelligence. There is some testimony about Gage, handling a chemist who retired from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and was considering doing conferences on 9-11, similar to Judy Wood. Obviously those conferences never happened, and the chemist is dead, now. I think his name was Peter Gregg, but I'm getting old, and my memory is wavering. If you need the chemists name, I can dig around and get his name and a link to the testimony about Gage. The web of liars, grifters, and those "in on it" is vast.
The entire AE911T/IC911J operation is obviously a military psy-op in my view. It purpose, from the very beginning, has been to exclude the use of classified military technology from public discussion and debate.
The web is indeed vast. I suspect that the large majority of the alternative media is not what it appears to be, and that most of it has been infiltrated by state power.
I agree. I forgot who said it, but “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves”. I do apologize for my memory on all these characters. If you need the exact name of the chemist who worked at Lawrence Livermore, where Gage, moved into his house out in California for an entire year, basically holding him hostage, until the guy died. I can dig up the testimony of the chemists personal friend that explains who the chemist was, and what went down with Gage, if you are interested. Maybe someday, you could write a book about all these people and their connections. If I had good writing and language skills, like you, I would do it. Also, in case you are interested, over here in America, there are many job openings with the title Role Player Surveillance ($20-$64). So this sort of activity (alt media, false flags etc) is not stopping any time soon.
If you can find the exact details, I would be interested to hear them.
The crisis actor simulation industry is also thriving.
David Gregg was the chemist at Lawrence Livermore (weapons) national Laboratory. Death announcement https://www.llnl.gov/community-education/employee-retirement-resources/in-memoriam/david-w-gregg Irene Gage is mentioned in this article. I have not been able to find the video testimony of David’s long time friend, where he stated Richard Gage from 9-11 truth was in David Greggs house etc. When I was trying to search for a connection between Irene and Richard via, articles, wiki. I could not find one. Oddly at the top of the search is that AI generated read out. It said Irene’s California address was connected to the 911 Architects and Engineers, address. Its the same address. (Yet no direct connection) AI is stupid, but whatever. I attached the video, that I did find, where David’s friend, a bank auditor located in California, does talk about knowing David. I know this is not hard evidence, but I can’t spend a lot of time starring at a computer screen, it makes me feel sick, and gives me a headache. I will search for the exact video, next week. https://rumble.com/v38xezg-charlie-miles-maddox-manson-20-and-his-bride-rosalie-willis15..html?e9s=src_v1_wh&playlist_id=watch-history
h ttps://search.brave.com/search?q=Richard+and+Irene+Gage&source=desktop&summary=1&conversation=76fa66b35268d38938aca3
9/11 Revisionist clipped the story about Dave Gregg, the Livermore Laboratory retiree (https://rumble.com/v6s67hn-richard-gage-the-spook-and-red-herring.html), from a Juxtaposition1 Substack article, 9/11 Revisionist doesn't remember which. Gage commented, "Almost all of what he says here is lie [sic]. Dave was my mothers' [sic] boyfriend. Listen to the evidence and decide for yourself the truth about 9/11: https://rumble.com/v6x8u74-australiaone-party-truth-about-911-richard-gage-aia-7-august-2025.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a". The link has nothing to do with Gregg or the story. I asked in a following comment, "It sounds pretty credible to me – at least I couldn't make anything like this up. So what in his story is true and what isn't?" There was no reply. Earlier today I asked again, "I'm still waiting for a reply to my question from a week ago: So what in his story is true and what isn't?" Still no reply.
The first link is certainly worth 6 minutes.
There was apparently a court case to start shortly in the US, private citizen suing US Govt and supposedly naming hundreds of people involved in the 9/11 event. I thought this might be something about it, as Tucker Carlson was part of it I think. Heard on an interview with the group Doctors for Medical Ethics International, which seems to be mainly Americans. Have you heard anything about this court case David?
No, can you post the details?
The problem we have is that we cannot trust the courts.
The only actual court cases that the "truth movement" has launched in relation to "9/11" were the Qui Tam cases by Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds in 2007. They got thrown out for no good reason.
An interview Ursula did, I think you follow her?
https://informedheart.substack.com/p/i-was-interviewed-by-the-international?
Thanks, Karin. Do you have the time stamp for the relevant section?
It was toward the end. Sorry don't have the exact time
Good article. I've read the Robinson/Walter article and watched the five-part Carlson series and "The Lost Art of 'Yes, And . . .'", so I know what you're talking about. I'm a Corbett subscriber and am forwarding this to him, though I assume he's already aware of it.
Yes, they all will be aware of it by now.
It will be interesting to see if they respond.
I watched an Eric Dubay video on 911 and another on the Oklahoma bombing last night. He's big on flat earth. Any views on that David?
I do not believe in flat earth. I watched an Eric Dubay video recently and thought it was vey obviously flawed.
Fair enough David. I thought he made a few good points
Flat Earthers do make good points - certainly enough to provoke serious reflection. Their ideas are not as crazy as they at first sound.
However, I remain unpersuaded by them.
Would you ever consider writing an article on the subject?
In an ideal world, yes.
However, there are many more pressing issues that need addressing.
Understood David. Nice talking to you. 👍