Delighted to know it's doing so well, David. I have the e-book but recently bought a print version as well for posterity (maybe the future Samizdat ...). Not signed though as it came from the Evil Empire, sadly!
Proud to own a copy of both of your books as well as the original downloaded version of this one. Looking forward to more (and to your continued participation in podcasts and forums, periodic articles, etc.).
Thank you for your diligence in researching, compiling, and writing these amazing, invaluable materials and for doing so at a (to say the least) difficult time!
PERHAPS it will inspire and embolden a NEW GENERATION Of academics to push beyond the present consensus/funding-driven work and to publish admittedly difficult truths that are not only controversial, but critical to societal harmony and the preservation of that which is good, decent, and wholesome, along with the raft of personal rights we otherwise see on the chopping block with only a small chorus of voices speaking out against the encroaching technocratic assimilation of all else.
Congratulations David! It was obvious to me that this scholarly book is also highly readable, and as such would appeal to non-academics. I suspect this is a rare accomplishment indeed. Looking forward to Volume 2!
Congrats, David, you deserve this! I am fortunate in that I have one of the hard copies. I realize you make little (or no) revenue from book sales, which prompted me to subscribe to your awesome Substack! I also love your second book, "Wall Street...." Keep them coming!
Jeez, wish you could have had access to some of that but the real gold of all of this work will not be denied you in the end. I think I paid over $150 for my hard copy and it was worth it. All of these fake numbers they push out are in collapse as people don't even look at "recommended" or five stars at all to give them confidence in anything on google search period. Let's not talk about the sad NY Times and especially the Book Review that went to absolute sh.....t in no time way before the covidian nightmare arrived. I remember the last issue I paid for had more dystopian, depressing and ridiculous books with a literal cartoon picture of a woman and her toddler in a glass beaker. I'm glad that polluted horror of a paper is on its way out. Hamamoto said it is controlled by a Mexican billionaire that owns massive corporations like telecom companies and others. All of this blows me away even now after five years. Watching the Delphi technique all over my local politics. Courtenay Turner has done great work on this.
The pockets they have left to keep people in the dark are shrinking. Don't you worry about a thing. I've got Sasha's artwork called Daniel in The Lion's Den. He keeps staring at me saying you're not doing enough. He's right so I and so many others are stepping it up.
I can easily help you with the “No plane” question you touch upon in your 9/11 Memorial Museum articles:
There were no planes only animations. Movie tricks, if you like. There is more than one way to prove this, and not one way to prove that there were planes. The laws of physics prove it in different ways.
Both aircrafts were Boeing 767. Their speeds were 494 and 586 mph respectively. 2nd plane had a velocity of 586 mph = 943 km/h. This is physically impossible at such low altitude.
Furthermore, I think it was in the documentary “The great american psy-opera” I saw a speed calculation based on the distance between some of the NY buildings and time measurements of the “plane” as it flew over those buildings. The calculated speed did not match the official speed and if I remember correctly the different videos even showed different speeds. In other words, the animated plane videos were not matched properly with the official (and ridiculous) 943 km/h, nor with each other.
The best proof of the “No plane” theory and how it was done movie-technologically is given in “The great american psy-opera” from 2:57:00 and about 10 minutes onwards: https://youtu.be/UmcOEY2cfi8?si=ol3-w1XJDpiHQwpr
Here he (Ace Baker) interviews the special effects movie guy who made the “Nose out” mistake (Or was it deliberate aka “Revelation of the method”?).
A plane can not disappear into thick walls of steel without any deceleration going in. Also, try to look into the burning hole (the photo in your article with the woman unaffected by the heat). Where is the plane debris?
That aside, the three rings on top of the OWTC-tower remind me of the 3 circles/rings painting in the lobby of the original WTC7. That building was the ultimate “Revelation of the method” on 9/11. They could have just taken it down a minute after the dustification of the 2nd tower. Then no movie of its collapse would exist. They even made the (deliberate?) mistake to report the WTC7 collapse on BBC (British Brainwashing Corporation) before it actually happened.
It is not like the perpetrators did not have plenty of time to plan the event and avoid unnecessary mistakes. I would recommend you to read Bain’s book “9/11 as mass ritual”. He concludes on page 156:
“(Just for the record, Dealey Plaza in Dallas, where President Kennedy was assassinated, is laid out as a trident. More on this other great American megaritual later.)
As you attempt to process the implications of this revelation, consider this: Combined with the other evidence, it now becomes extremely difficult to escape the conclusion that these buildings were designed and constructed with their ultimate purpose in mind”.
I am working on a book. I have reached the same conclusion as Bain regarding the WTC’s planned destiny even before their construction was started (in 1966).
One final word: There are at least two WTC tridents placed on other locations in NY. I have the details somewhere in my extensive notes, if you are interested.
If it is Simon Shack you are referring to, his work was debunked long ago. Ace Baker is also known not to be trustworthy.
I hear a lot that planes cannot fly at that speed so close to ground level. I imagine that is probably true, but I would like to see some hard evidence based on physics.
The "butter planes" concept does require explanation. How did the planes melt into the buildings? Missiles cloaked with 3D holographic projection seems to fit, but I have not investigated the planes very extensively.
I would recommend the work of Mark Conlon.
Personally, I doubt that the Twin Towers were designed and constructed with their ultimate destruction in mind. The trident connection is probably a meaningless coincidence, unless you know otherwise?
I am not sure who Simon Shack is. But I know who Mark Conlon is, because I had a few debates with him and his partner "9/11 Revisionist" this year. I criticised them because they focus on subjects that are irrelevant and are adding to the confusion. Conlon is obsessed with studying the plane routes. I tried to explain him that since there were no airplanes these routes are not relevant. He doesn't want to discuss the no airplanes detail.
They go absolutely bananas if you mention Ace Baker to them. But they don't want to discus the details of his work. They go after his granddad who worked for UN and God knows what else.
The discussion should just be about wether there were airplanes or not. In that context Ace Baker's work is some of the most useful. The documentary "September Clues" was the one who convinced me that there were no airplanes. I think that one was actually made by this Simon Shack guy. I tried to watch a 2nd time, but stopped because "The great american psy-opera" is better.
But it is a matter of using one's own eyes and slowing down the videos, plus studying photos and a cross-section of the towers.
No, the trident detail about the JFK assassination is important because that event was also fictional/staged. It was a hoax as proven by Jay Weidner (another guy who is unfortunately easy to discredit - if that is what wants to do). Also the long article "Kings of the Underground" by another analyst proves it. If you read Bain's book it will be clear to you why the trident detail is important. Bain is not aware that the JFK assassination was fake.
I spent a year analysing Bain’s claim about the WTC's pre-planned destiny, but from other angles. I am finally convinced. After re-reading his book a 2nd time, I think his book proves it alone.
Regardless, the "no planes" hypothesis does seem to have a lot of evidence to support it.
The Bain book is peculiar. When I searched for "trident," one section titled "The Trident Returns" contains the line "Arizona State University’s downtown Phoenix campus had been obliterated by the nuclear blast." This turns out to be "a hypothetical scenario for a false-flag mass ritual that fortunately didn’t occur in December 2012." I prefer real-world facts that are verifiable. His other stuff trying to link the trident to Satan's ptichfork doesn't seem all that convincing to me.
That was a fictional essay he wrote in his book. I didn't read it. 9/11 was a ritual. If you find a better interpretation than Bain then please let me know.
These matters takes years to learn. Sorting good from bad information is key. Much of the most important information is mixed with bad. Weidner for example. Unfortunately, there are not many good conspiracy analysts who are also trained academics like you.
But the "no plane" is easy: The physical laws were broken before, when and after the planes hit. That is a matter of observation and intellect.
I just went through the first 10 search results on "Baker" in that book (which I have already taken a look at long ago). All 10 results are about "researcher Ace Baker falsely claimed he had reproduced one or more of John Hutchison’s experiments, then admitted he had actually engaged in making a fake video".
First of all, this is not a debunk. Why doesn't the book document this accusation? Is it important if his work in "The great american psy-opera" holds water?
Baker shouldn't lie of course (if he has done that). But for 9/11 these 10 results I just saw are not important.
Looking forward to reading Vol. 2. Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy is a master work. For an average person --like myself, or anyone who really wants to understand what has taken place, not only since 2020 but the shaping of our lives without conscious knowledge just in the last hundred and twenty odd years,I suggest owning this book. A work I will refer to again and again. David, I hope you will be justly compensated. A best compensation, in my judgement, will be that that society will embrace it and spread its message.
I read your Substack regularly and share with others. Unfortunately I don't get much feedback. I must really need to expand my friendships.
Thank you, Alison. I agree, the best compensation would be for a critical mass of people to read and understand my book - and then take action accordingly.
Fabulous news! I cherish the copy I proudly own!
Yes, a rare signed copy!
Delighted to know it's doing so well, David. I have the e-book but recently bought a print version as well for posterity (maybe the future Samizdat ...). Not signed though as it came from the Evil Empire, sadly!
Let's hope things don't go as far as that!
A win for real academia. Well done David, much deserved and even better that it's being read outside of the so called academia bubble.
Thank you. Yes, I don't think the solution to our problems is going to come from within academia...
Proud to own a copy of both of your books as well as the original downloaded version of this one. Looking forward to more (and to your continued participation in podcasts and forums, periodic articles, etc.).
Thank you for your diligence in researching, compiling, and writing these amazing, invaluable materials and for doing so at a (to say the least) difficult time!
PERHAPS it will inspire and embolden a NEW GENERATION Of academics to push beyond the present consensus/funding-driven work and to publish admittedly difficult truths that are not only controversial, but critical to societal harmony and the preservation of that which is good, decent, and wholesome, along with the raft of personal rights we otherwise see on the chopping block with only a small chorus of voices speaking out against the encroaching technocratic assimilation of all else.
Here's hoping!!
Congratulations David! It was obvious to me that this scholarly book is also highly readable, and as such would appeal to non-academics. I suspect this is a rare accomplishment indeed. Looking forward to Volume 2!
Thanks, Rod!
Congratulations David!
Congrats, David, you deserve this! I am fortunate in that I have one of the hard copies. I realize you make little (or no) revenue from book sales, which prompted me to subscribe to your awesome Substack! I also love your second book, "Wall Street...." Keep them coming!
Thanks, JDK!
I certainly intend to!
Jeez, wish you could have had access to some of that but the real gold of all of this work will not be denied you in the end. I think I paid over $150 for my hard copy and it was worth it. All of these fake numbers they push out are in collapse as people don't even look at "recommended" or five stars at all to give them confidence in anything on google search period. Let's not talk about the sad NY Times and especially the Book Review that went to absolute sh.....t in no time way before the covidian nightmare arrived. I remember the last issue I paid for had more dystopian, depressing and ridiculous books with a literal cartoon picture of a woman and her toddler in a glass beaker. I'm glad that polluted horror of a paper is on its way out. Hamamoto said it is controlled by a Mexican billionaire that owns massive corporations like telecom companies and others. All of this blows me away even now after five years. Watching the Delphi technique all over my local politics. Courtenay Turner has done great work on this.
Another reader asked Perplexity who I am. Look at how well shadow-banned I am in the mainstream:
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/who-is-dr-david-a-hughes-75wao3MVQ7GKXaFoqBV42g
Hilarious! "Sorry something went wrong?" People know how to read this bullocks and it only makes them more determined to dig deeper.
The pockets they have left to keep people in the dark are shrinking. Don't you worry about a thing. I've got Sasha's artwork called Daniel in The Lion's Den. He keeps staring at me saying you're not doing enough. He's right so I and so many others are stepping it up.
"And when Daniel was lifted from the den, no wound was found on him, because he had trusted in his God."
Subscribed! I will gladly support your work. Your 9/11 Memorial Museum articles are great too.
Thanks, Morten. I look forward to hearing your views on the museum!
I can easily help you with the “No plane” question you touch upon in your 9/11 Memorial Museum articles:
There were no planes only animations. Movie tricks, if you like. There is more than one way to prove this, and not one way to prove that there were planes. The laws of physics prove it in different ways.
Both aircrafts were Boeing 767. Their speeds were 494 and 586 mph respectively. 2nd plane had a velocity of 586 mph = 943 km/h. This is physically impossible at such low altitude.
Furthermore, I think it was in the documentary “The great american psy-opera” I saw a speed calculation based on the distance between some of the NY buildings and time measurements of the “plane” as it flew over those buildings. The calculated speed did not match the official speed and if I remember correctly the different videos even showed different speeds. In other words, the animated plane videos were not matched properly with the official (and ridiculous) 943 km/h, nor with each other.
The best proof of the “No plane” theory and how it was done movie-technologically is given in “The great american psy-opera” from 2:57:00 and about 10 minutes onwards: https://youtu.be/UmcOEY2cfi8?si=ol3-w1XJDpiHQwpr
Here he (Ace Baker) interviews the special effects movie guy who made the “Nose out” mistake (Or was it deliberate aka “Revelation of the method”?).
A plane can not disappear into thick walls of steel without any deceleration going in. Also, try to look into the burning hole (the photo in your article with the woman unaffected by the heat). Where is the plane debris?
That aside, the three rings on top of the OWTC-tower remind me of the 3 circles/rings painting in the lobby of the original WTC7. That building was the ultimate “Revelation of the method” on 9/11. They could have just taken it down a minute after the dustification of the 2nd tower. Then no movie of its collapse would exist. They even made the (deliberate?) mistake to report the WTC7 collapse on BBC (British Brainwashing Corporation) before it actually happened.
It is not like the perpetrators did not have plenty of time to plan the event and avoid unnecessary mistakes. I would recommend you to read Bain’s book “9/11 as mass ritual”. He concludes on page 156:
“(Just for the record, Dealey Plaza in Dallas, where President Kennedy was assassinated, is laid out as a trident. More on this other great American megaritual later.)
As you attempt to process the implications of this revelation, consider this: Combined with the other evidence, it now becomes extremely difficult to escape the conclusion that these buildings were designed and constructed with their ultimate purpose in mind”.
I am working on a book. I have reached the same conclusion as Bain regarding the WTC’s planned destiny even before their construction was started (in 1966).
One final word: There are at least two WTC tridents placed on other locations in NY. I have the details somewhere in my extensive notes, if you are interested.
If it is Simon Shack you are referring to, his work was debunked long ago. Ace Baker is also known not to be trustworthy.
I hear a lot that planes cannot fly at that speed so close to ground level. I imagine that is probably true, but I would like to see some hard evidence based on physics.
The "butter planes" concept does require explanation. How did the planes melt into the buildings? Missiles cloaked with 3D holographic projection seems to fit, but I have not investigated the planes very extensively.
I would recommend the work of Mark Conlon.
Personally, I doubt that the Twin Towers were designed and constructed with their ultimate destruction in mind. The trident connection is probably a meaningless coincidence, unless you know otherwise?
I am not sure who Simon Shack is. But I know who Mark Conlon is, because I had a few debates with him and his partner "9/11 Revisionist" this year. I criticised them because they focus on subjects that are irrelevant and are adding to the confusion. Conlon is obsessed with studying the plane routes. I tried to explain him that since there were no airplanes these routes are not relevant. He doesn't want to discuss the no airplanes detail.
They go absolutely bananas if you mention Ace Baker to them. But they don't want to discus the details of his work. They go after his granddad who worked for UN and God knows what else.
The discussion should just be about wether there were airplanes or not. In that context Ace Baker's work is some of the most useful. The documentary "September Clues" was the one who convinced me that there were no airplanes. I think that one was actually made by this Simon Shack guy. I tried to watch a 2nd time, but stopped because "The great american psy-opera" is better.
But it is a matter of using one's own eyes and slowing down the videos, plus studying photos and a cross-section of the towers.
No, the trident detail about the JFK assassination is important because that event was also fictional/staged. It was a hoax as proven by Jay Weidner (another guy who is unfortunately easy to discredit - if that is what wants to do). Also the long article "Kings of the Underground" by another analyst proves it. If you read Bain's book it will be clear to you why the trident detail is important. Bain is not aware that the JFK assassination was fake.
I spent a year analysing Bain’s claim about the WTC's pre-planned destiny, but from other angles. I am finally convinced. After re-reading his book a 2nd time, I think his book proves it alone.
Simon Shack made "September Clues," which was debunked long ago. The "planes" - whatever they were - were not simply media fakery.
I don't see a contradiction between positing no planes and proving that the claimed flights are problematic based on official data, as Conlon does.
Ch. 8 of Andrew Johnson's book, 9/11: Holding The Truth, has some info on Simon Hytten (Shack): https://checktheevidencecom.ipage.com/checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf
There's plenty on Ace Baker in Andrew's other book, 9/11: Finding the Truth: https://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf
Neither character seems trustworthy.
Regardless, the "no planes" hypothesis does seem to have a lot of evidence to support it.
The Bain book is peculiar. When I searched for "trident," one section titled "The Trident Returns" contains the line "Arizona State University’s downtown Phoenix campus had been obliterated by the nuclear blast." This turns out to be "a hypothetical scenario for a false-flag mass ritual that fortunately didn’t occur in December 2012." I prefer real-world facts that are verifiable. His other stuff trying to link the trident to Satan's ptichfork doesn't seem all that convincing to me.
That was a fictional essay he wrote in his book. I didn't read it. 9/11 was a ritual. If you find a better interpretation than Bain then please let me know.
These matters takes years to learn. Sorting good from bad information is key. Much of the most important information is mixed with bad. Weidner for example. Unfortunately, there are not many good conspiracy analysts who are also trained academics like you.
But the "no plane" is easy: The physical laws were broken before, when and after the planes hit. That is a matter of observation and intellect.
I just went through the first 10 search results on "Baker" in that book (which I have already taken a look at long ago). All 10 results are about "researcher Ace Baker falsely claimed he had reproduced one or more of John Hutchison’s experiments, then admitted he had actually engaged in making a fake video".
First of all, this is not a debunk. Why doesn't the book document this accusation? Is it important if his work in "The great american psy-opera" holds water?
Baker shouldn't lie of course (if he has done that). But for 9/11 these 10 results I just saw are not important.
Looking forward to reading Vol. 2. Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy is a master work. For an average person --like myself, or anyone who really wants to understand what has taken place, not only since 2020 but the shaping of our lives without conscious knowledge just in the last hundred and twenty odd years,I suggest owning this book. A work I will refer to again and again. David, I hope you will be justly compensated. A best compensation, in my judgement, will be that that society will embrace it and spread its message.
I read your Substack regularly and share with others. Unfortunately I don't get much feedback. I must really need to expand my friendships.
Thank you, Alison. I agree, the best compensation would be for a critical mass of people to read and understand my book - and then take action accordingly.