I find the framing of Cognitive Warfare targets into groups particularly helpful. It's clear that total perception control is their game but its impossible to make sense of without a guide. Why is Fauci still around talking about masks? Clearly that is information for Camp 1.
It's somewhat amazing that the cat is now out of the bag. That usually means it's been around for several decades...
Transmitting thoughts with microwave devices (the victims "heard voices") was employed by the Soviets already in the late 1970s... As the author's recent interview also shows, this gadget has been available for quite a while:
Since the introduction of 5G and comparable technologies that interact with nanoparticles in food, water, and air, people can be tracked and targeted individually :
As for Big Lies, I beg to differ: as Goebbels suggested, good propaganda is always based on facts. The royalty of all mass manipulation ("camp 1" in the article) is compartmentalization, usually mixed with red herrings, limited hangouts, bait-and-switch operations, divide-and-rule, and general gaslighting:
The article, also ingenuously suggests that "the truth" camp is also fake, and I have always concurred. The very idea of someone posing as an Oracle for the Truth always made me sick:
Thanks, Ray. It all makes one wonder what classified technologies have been developed in the last year, which the public will only find out about in 2050!
Indeed. However, they then started harnessing cyber technologies, which allow a far higher degree of control. Still, it's always good to see them fail!
For some time I've had trouble reading books cover to cover, though I used to read about a book per month. I knew it was because of the web, but I never thought it might be the result of deliberate strategy.
Last night I suggested to my wife that in the future I might give up my smart phone. Got a hostile reaction about "going backwards", though I did actually give it up for a month some time back and she was supportive then.
I'm ambivalent about such tech. I still hope it can be designed to support human needs of privacy, real world socializing, etc., or at least not cause harm in those ways. The first thing must be to remove evil incentives to make them that way.
Also, I think people need to find ways to use these things to enhance freedom. If they build a railroad through our hunting grounds, we can't successfully oppose it with just bows and arrows.
Anyway there's lots in your article that I need to add to my ontology!
Great article, David. I bet some people get confused between the Generations of warfare, and the Domains of warfare. They are not identical. So, while one talks about 5GW addressing Human Domain, the Human Domain is #4, while the Generation is #5. The term OmniWar is growing on me.
I would also like to draw a fuzzy line between Cognitive Warfare that incudes bio-nano tech, or not. Why is it important? Because direct in situ intervention makes Cognitive Warfare so much more effective. And while we can't tell right now which one is which, we should at least have a conceptual distinction between the two.
Now let me throw a monkey wrench in what I just said - beam forming cognitive modification is possible even without bio-nano technology. That makes three types of Cognitive Warfare: 1) IT-socio/behaivioral type; 2) IT-socio/behavioral/EM type; and finally 3) IT-socio/behavioral/EM/bio-nano type. Number three would include a digital twin of your brain on the cloud, All three types are powered by AI.
Hi Len, you're right, it is staggering how many types of warfare are being deployed against the population and/or are in development for such usage.
I think of your 1-3 categories in terms of cognitive warfare, electromagnetic warfare, and direct neurological warfare. What they all have in common are attacks on the mind/brain.
Regarding Camp 2…. When O’keefe started promoting Erik Prince’s (founder of Blackwater; and its subsequent serially rebranding nomenclature) “Unplugged” tech company, I realized I had to take a step back and reevaluate what I knew about him.
Yes indeed. The realization I have come to in recent months is that Camp 2 is far larger than Camp 3, and that a massive amount of military investment must be going into sustaining its battalion of fake dissidents and fake dissident organizations.
On the other hand, the scale of this effort perhaps indicates that the truth is their biggest weak spot and they are desperately doing all they can to stop the dam from bursting.
What you describe reminds me of a perspective I realized in the 2016 US election cycle.
Just the fact that the Elites have to go to such great lengths and spend such astounding amounts of money to remain in power, shows that they aren’t as “all-powerful” as it may seem.
I think the World Wide Web is a huge factor. It was created by the capitalists as a military and productivity tool and is in the process of being appropriated by We The People.
The web is at the center of the struggle against censorship. The ruling class may have created it, but I believe it scares the bejesus out of them.
It used to be that you had to create a web site and host it on your computer. Anybody could do it, but it was pretty complex, not to mention that, if big brother thought you were a problem, he could cause a lot of problems with your web site.
Then came social media like Facebook, where making a site was easy but the censorship and data storage were centralized. Substack is a variant of that, where the regime allows more freedom in order to harvest content for their AI large language models, so freedom of expression is allowed but not freedom of association, i.e. freedom to organize, which is prevented by shadow banning which I think Substack does a fair amount of. But at least with social media you no longer had to create a web site or worry about protecting it from online attacks.
The next step will be federating or distributing social media servers with protocols like ActivityPub, which will allow better protection of personal data and make shadow banning more difficult. Already, Substack competitor Ghost allows federation with ActivityPub and Substack may be forced to do that as well.
I also think the elites thought they would have a much easier time with enforcing internet censorship than it’s turned out to be.
It appears that “semi-white hat” elites (like Musk) have created inefficiencies for the pro-censorship regime, and this has caused them to have to slow down their onslaught on free speech, and in certain circumstances even back peddle in effort to stop the bleed of people leaving pro-censorship platforms for more anti-censorship platforms.
In a way, it’s actually correlating quite strongly with economic principles, like consumer theory. As more competition arises (ie: Musk buying Twitter), the black hat elites have to make moves analogous to ‘lowering their prices’ to keep consumers.
Speaking of cognitive warfare, you may like The Delingpod's interview with Brian Gerrish of UK Column. You'll have to scroll down a bit but hear it to the end when they discuss Common Purpose and the use of NLP. Once just used for the top tier has now been dripped down into all the levels. An especially creepy organisation. A Brit sent to Chicago working with Obama group.
Yes, I have seen this, and Gerrish's other material around Common Purpose. As you say, very creepy how such organisations have been able to infiltrate political systems around the world.
Agreed. The levels of infiltration are staggering. I for one would love to know more about exactly how they manage it. I think UK Column's work is very valuable in that respect, e.g. Ben Rubin's sections on actors who would otherwise not attract much public attention but who are clearly exercising a disproportionate impact.
The philanthropy panopticon is massively influential and very ugly. It is now in every community with their lying noble words and good people believe it. The conversation with G Edward Griffin and Norman Dodd lays it all out. The same trick over and over. Rockefeller, Gates all exonerated from their horrific reputations through giving. Are eugenicists running the biggest philanthropic organisations? You bet. Wellcome Trust and all the rest. Wellcome Trust is holding all the old eugenics records for safe keeping. The fake philanthropy is massive. Expose this and their benevolent PR campaigns they pay millions for worthless and worse revealing them. That public/private partnership fascistic con they created is seeing it will soon be hollowed out, losing all legitimacy and a Nuremberg of killer philanthropy on its way.
I agree about the "philanthropic" foundations counting among the most evil organisations on earth. In first place is the Rockefeller Foundation. I welcome Nordangard's new book in that respect.
He is fantastic. Love his tone. A tone we all need to take up when addressing or even referencing this cartoonish group more exposed than ever. Nothing like billionaires and eugenicists pushing equity to make for a great broadway show.
Thanks, Terry. Just a very small part, actually. The problem with trying to cram an Omniwar into 45-minutes is that you can't say too much on each individual element!
Great article and I've seen the "fighting" of these three camps in real time in my interactions with the 9/11 distraction movement...
Psychology of resistance to truth about 9/11
An email discussion with Fran Shur & Marti Hopper, psychologists
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/psychology-of-resistance-to-truth
Warring AGAINST free speech, open discourse, and the truth of what really happened on 9/11
A War Room... Or a padded playroom, a safe space?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/cowards-for-911-truth
Refutation of the 9/11 "truther" narratives
A special presentation refuting 10 points of contention against DEW on 9/11
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/refutation-of-the-911-truther-narratives
Participation in the 9/11 "WarRoom"
A quick update on warring AGAINST free speech, open discourse, and the truth
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/participation-in-the-911-warroom
TAP Dancing Away From 9/11 Truth?
The only way to get to truth is to take ACTION!
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/tap-dancing-away-from-911-truth
The tell-tale signs of a 9/11 cult.
Countering a 9/11 cult that cannot count past 3.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-telltale-signs-of-a-911-cult
9/11 and the Debunking Olympics.
It's been ongoing since 2005 and the truth seems to be lurking in the shadows.
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-and-the-debunking-olympics
Thanks. This is a useful set of resources for spotting the hallmarks of bad actors in Camp 2.
GREAT list of resources. Thank you!
I find the framing of Cognitive Warfare targets into groups particularly helpful. It's clear that total perception control is their game but its impossible to make sense of without a guide. Why is Fauci still around talking about masks? Clearly that is information for Camp 1.
Yes indeed!
The documentation is exquisite!
It's somewhat amazing that the cat is now out of the bag. That usually means it's been around for several decades...
Transmitting thoughts with microwave devices (the victims "heard voices") was employed by the Soviets already in the late 1970s... As the author's recent interview also shows, this gadget has been available for quite a while:
https://dhughes.substack.com/p/electromagnetic-warfare-history-and
Psychotronic weapons have been applied probably a lot longer than public records suggest:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/psychotronic-and-electromagnetic
Mind control itself goes back by several more decades. Sirhan was one of the first victims:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/from-mind-control-to-selective-killings
Since the introduction of 5G and comparable technologies that interact with nanoparticles in food, water, and air, people can be tracked and targeted individually :
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/targeting-and-controlling-individuals
As for Big Lies, I beg to differ: as Goebbels suggested, good propaganda is always based on facts. The royalty of all mass manipulation ("camp 1" in the article) is compartmentalization, usually mixed with red herrings, limited hangouts, bait-and-switch operations, divide-and-rule, and general gaslighting:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-to-capture-the-world
Well that includes "camp 2" as well, and indeed, folk heroes are created out of thin air by "opposing" the official line:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/folk-heroes-created-by-the-globalists
The article, also ingenuously suggests that "the truth" camp is also fake, and I have always concurred. The very idea of someone posing as an Oracle for the Truth always made me sick:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/there-is-a-new-word-that-makes-me
I somewhat disagree with the author that this camp is small. As far as I can see, mostly everyone considers themselves a fountain of "the Truth."
These days, indeed, algorithms are used, most likely by an AI running a live global simulation:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/ai-makes-the-world-go-round
Thanks, Ray. It all makes one wonder what classified technologies have been developed in the last year, which the public will only find out about in 2050!
Clear, courageous, and masterfully written and sourced! Thank you!
Great article!
But it must be remembered that they didn't exactly succeed in "mastering the human domain" in Afghanistan.
Indeed. However, they then started harnessing cyber technologies, which allow a far higher degree of control. Still, it's always good to see them fail!
For some time I've had trouble reading books cover to cover, though I used to read about a book per month. I knew it was because of the web, but I never thought it might be the result of deliberate strategy.
Last night I suggested to my wife that in the future I might give up my smart phone. Got a hostile reaction about "going backwards", though I did actually give it up for a month some time back and she was supportive then.
I'm ambivalent about such tech. I still hope it can be designed to support human needs of privacy, real world socializing, etc., or at least not cause harm in those ways. The first thing must be to remove evil incentives to make them that way.
Also, I think people need to find ways to use these things to enhance freedom. If they build a railroad through our hunting grounds, we can't successfully oppose it with just bows and arrows.
Anyway there's lots in your article that I need to add to my ontology!
Great article, David. I bet some people get confused between the Generations of warfare, and the Domains of warfare. They are not identical. So, while one talks about 5GW addressing Human Domain, the Human Domain is #4, while the Generation is #5. The term OmniWar is growing on me.
I would also like to draw a fuzzy line between Cognitive Warfare that incudes bio-nano tech, or not. Why is it important? Because direct in situ intervention makes Cognitive Warfare so much more effective. And while we can't tell right now which one is which, we should at least have a conceptual distinction between the two.
Now let me throw a monkey wrench in what I just said - beam forming cognitive modification is possible even without bio-nano technology. That makes three types of Cognitive Warfare: 1) IT-socio/behaivioral type; 2) IT-socio/behavioral/EM type; and finally 3) IT-socio/behavioral/EM/bio-nano type. Number three would include a digital twin of your brain on the cloud, All three types are powered by AI.
How about this for a framework?
Hi Len, you're right, it is staggering how many types of warfare are being deployed against the population and/or are in development for such usage.
I think of your 1-3 categories in terms of cognitive warfare, electromagnetic warfare, and direct neurological warfare. What they all have in common are attacks on the mind/brain.
Thank you for distilling my thoughts, David! I am adopting these 3 categories of Cognitive Warfare!
Regarding Camp 2…. When O’keefe started promoting Erik Prince’s (founder of Blackwater; and its subsequent serially rebranding nomenclature) “Unplugged” tech company, I realized I had to take a step back and reevaluate what I knew about him.
Yes indeed. The realization I have come to in recent months is that Camp 2 is far larger than Camp 3, and that a massive amount of military investment must be going into sustaining its battalion of fake dissidents and fake dissident organizations.
On the other hand, the scale of this effort perhaps indicates that the truth is their biggest weak spot and they are desperately doing all they can to stop the dam from bursting.
Absolutely, 100%.
What you describe reminds me of a perspective I realized in the 2016 US election cycle.
Just the fact that the Elites have to go to such great lengths and spend such astounding amounts of money to remain in power, shows that they aren’t as “all-powerful” as it may seem.
They are highly vulnerable, and indeed desperate.
I think the World Wide Web is a huge factor. It was created by the capitalists as a military and productivity tool and is in the process of being appropriated by We The People.
The web is at the center of the struggle against censorship. The ruling class may have created it, but I believe it scares the bejesus out of them.
It used to be that you had to create a web site and host it on your computer. Anybody could do it, but it was pretty complex, not to mention that, if big brother thought you were a problem, he could cause a lot of problems with your web site.
Then came social media like Facebook, where making a site was easy but the censorship and data storage were centralized. Substack is a variant of that, where the regime allows more freedom in order to harvest content for their AI large language models, so freedom of expression is allowed but not freedom of association, i.e. freedom to organize, which is prevented by shadow banning which I think Substack does a fair amount of. But at least with social media you no longer had to create a web site or worry about protecting it from online attacks.
The next step will be federating or distributing social media servers with protocols like ActivityPub, which will allow better protection of personal data and make shadow banning more difficult. Already, Substack competitor Ghost allows federation with ActivityPub and Substack may be forced to do that as well.
https://substack.com/@yetanothertommy/note/c-67642755
This is interesting. Thank you - I must look into Ghost.
Sorry I have to add a correction. Ghost does not yet allow ActivityPub integration, but they say they're working on it.
I also think the elites thought they would have a much easier time with enforcing internet censorship than it’s turned out to be.
It appears that “semi-white hat” elites (like Musk) have created inefficiencies for the pro-censorship regime, and this has caused them to have to slow down their onslaught on free speech, and in certain circumstances even back peddle in effort to stop the bleed of people leaving pro-censorship platforms for more anti-censorship platforms.
In a way, it’s actually correlating quite strongly with economic principles, like consumer theory. As more competition arises (ie: Musk buying Twitter), the black hat elites have to make moves analogous to ‘lowering their prices’ to keep consumers.
What are the anti-censorship platforms? Because Substack, for example, does a lot of shadow banning.
From the things I see, our young people sense that something just is not right. In general, the elderly are a lost cause.
I don't think anyone is a lost cause....
You may be right. It looks like Brazil now understands the game.
But this is going to hurt a lot of people before it ends.
Speaking of cognitive warfare, you may like The Delingpod's interview with Brian Gerrish of UK Column. You'll have to scroll down a bit but hear it to the end when they discuss Common Purpose and the use of NLP. Once just used for the top tier has now been dripped down into all the levels. An especially creepy organisation. A Brit sent to Chicago working with Obama group.
Yes, I have seen this, and Gerrish's other material around Common Purpose. As you say, very creepy how such organisations have been able to infiltrate political systems around the world.
No flies on Hughes. Good. The method they use must be studied and exposed like shining a light on the cockroaches which is what they are.
Agreed. The levels of infiltration are staggering. I for one would love to know more about exactly how they manage it. I think UK Column's work is very valuable in that respect, e.g. Ben Rubin's sections on actors who would otherwise not attract much public attention but who are clearly exercising a disproportionate impact.
The philanthropy panopticon is massively influential and very ugly. It is now in every community with their lying noble words and good people believe it. The conversation with G Edward Griffin and Norman Dodd lays it all out. The same trick over and over. Rockefeller, Gates all exonerated from their horrific reputations through giving. Are eugenicists running the biggest philanthropic organisations? You bet. Wellcome Trust and all the rest. Wellcome Trust is holding all the old eugenics records for safe keeping. The fake philanthropy is massive. Expose this and their benevolent PR campaigns they pay millions for worthless and worse revealing them. That public/private partnership fascistic con they created is seeing it will soon be hollowed out, losing all legitimacy and a Nuremberg of killer philanthropy on its way.
I agree about the "philanthropic" foundations counting among the most evil organisations on earth. In first place is the Rockefeller Foundation. I welcome Nordangard's new book in that respect.
He is fantastic. Love his tone. A tone we all need to take up when addressing or even referencing this cartoonish group more exposed than ever. Nothing like billionaires and eugenicists pushing equity to make for a great broadway show.
Excellent piece David , I imagine this content will an integral part of your discussion at the Omniwar symposium.
Thanks, Terry. Just a very small part, actually. The problem with trying to cram an Omniwar into 45-minutes is that you can't say too much on each individual element!