David, that was a very impressive presentation that was received with an ovation. I emphasized, that this is not a voice of a targeted individual but an unbiased view of an academic who made this topic a part of his impartial research. You truly made a splash, and helped us to further the notion that we are no longer a fringe group. Thank you!
Well that cheered me up! Just kidding. It's a horrific technology being designed by what could best be described as twisted sadistic minds. The stuff of horror movies and nightmares.
But here's the thing - could this wireless technology really work on any significant scale? As for that nano-junk injected into 5 billion people (reportedly), will it really work beyond making a lot of people suffer poor health and die prematurely? I have a hunch that the human body, not to mention the human spirit, will by and large overcome the assaults being directed at us.
But I'm cautious, of course. I typing this under candlelight on a laptop because my mains meter went on the blink and the electricity company wants to replace it with a "smart" meter only - so no deal. My house has no "smart" devices in it. Not even wifi. So there's that.
I suspect that most readers of this substack are familiar with the "scientific consensus" of man-made climate change emergency. All hype and spin with very little real hard data to back it.
Or take the urge to "follow the science" regarding Covid lockdowns and experimental injections. Pure propagnda devoid of truth.
So I have to ask, how many of these reports used in this presentation is factual or largely hype? We all know there is considerable pressure for scientists to produce the "right results", and bury the wrong results. Their continued funding and reputation may depend on it.
So if it was discovered that humans aren't actually "hackable animals", and there are large funds available to make us "hackable", is it possible that, like the man-made climate change scam, scientists fudge their results and produce reports with a rather thin connection to the truth?
I'm sure there are evil technocrats who would love to remotely control the masses. But to what degree can they actually able to pull it off? The mass injection of unknown substances is certainly unnerving. But was it a success, or failure? I suspect the latter.
Ditto for whether or not the "vaccine" rollout achieved what it was meant to. Perhaps it was a worldwide experiment intended to help calibrate different levels of whatever was in the shots, in which case it may have served its purpose. We just don't know.
One thing we do know, however, is that there is an extensive literature on biodigital convergence and the Internet of BioNano Things. The agenda to hook human beings up to a wireless network goes at least as far back as the turn of the millennium. The CIA mooted remote control human beings in 1960. NATO did the same in a 2009 document. If you read Part 4 of my co-authored transhumanism series, you will see that there is an extensive military intelligence literature on all of this. The intent is demonstrably real.
This is very different from the "climate emergency" scam, where the technocrats know they are engaged in an advanced deception operation about something which does not exist. In the case of biodigital convergence, the aim is precisely to fund it into existence. Which is why we need to take it very seriously indeed.
Then there were reports of DEW in play during the 1989 Panama Invasion, as documented in th Academy Award Winning 1992 documentary: The Panama Deception.
There was also the 2006 investigative report - Star Wars in Iraq - That documented the possible use of DEW in 2003 during Desert Storm....
Dean Warwick talks about other DEW tech from the 1950's and 1960's in this article of mine...
David, that was a very impressive presentation that was received with an ovation. I emphasized, that this is not a voice of a targeted individual but an unbiased view of an academic who made this topic a part of his impartial research. You truly made a splash, and helped us to further the notion that we are no longer a fringe group. Thank you!
Wow, that's great news! You've made my day, Len!
Many thanks, David. I have cross-posted to my 7,100+ subscribers.
Thanks, Frances - and for encouraging me to explore this area a few months ago!
You are very welcome! You certainly made a neat job of the history! xx
These developments are bleak and distressing to face , but face it we must in order to oppose it in the greatest numbers possible.
EXACTLY right.
Mr. Hughes, you're becoming a MAJOR voice in the world. Thank heavens. It's incredible to witness. Stay safe. Stay alive.
WWW.LORENHECHT.NET
Why, thank you.
Stay tuned for the Omniwar symposium on September 21...
Well that cheered me up! Just kidding. It's a horrific technology being designed by what could best be described as twisted sadistic minds. The stuff of horror movies and nightmares.
But here's the thing - could this wireless technology really work on any significant scale? As for that nano-junk injected into 5 billion people (reportedly), will it really work beyond making a lot of people suffer poor health and die prematurely? I have a hunch that the human body, not to mention the human spirit, will by and large overcome the assaults being directed at us.
But I'm cautious, of course. I typing this under candlelight on a laptop because my mains meter went on the blink and the electricity company wants to replace it with a "smart" meter only - so no deal. My house has no "smart" devices in it. Not even wifi. So there's that.
Stay blessed.
Thanks, Zainab. Nice to hear from you.
I suspect that most readers of this substack are familiar with the "scientific consensus" of man-made climate change emergency. All hype and spin with very little real hard data to back it.
Or take the urge to "follow the science" regarding Covid lockdowns and experimental injections. Pure propagnda devoid of truth.
So I have to ask, how many of these reports used in this presentation is factual or largely hype? We all know there is considerable pressure for scientists to produce the "right results", and bury the wrong results. Their continued funding and reputation may depend on it.
So if it was discovered that humans aren't actually "hackable animals", and there are large funds available to make us "hackable", is it possible that, like the man-made climate change scam, scientists fudge their results and produce reports with a rather thin connection to the truth?
I'm sure there are evil technocrats who would love to remotely control the masses. But to what degree can they actually able to pull it off? The mass injection of unknown substances is certainly unnerving. But was it a success, or failure? I suspect the latter.
Good points, Simon.
I hope that humans aren't actually "hackable"!
But we are looking at unknowns.
Ditto for whether or not the "vaccine" rollout achieved what it was meant to. Perhaps it was a worldwide experiment intended to help calibrate different levels of whatever was in the shots, in which case it may have served its purpose. We just don't know.
One thing we do know, however, is that there is an extensive literature on biodigital convergence and the Internet of BioNano Things. The agenda to hook human beings up to a wireless network goes at least as far back as the turn of the millennium. The CIA mooted remote control human beings in 1960. NATO did the same in a 2009 document. If you read Part 4 of my co-authored transhumanism series, you will see that there is an extensive military intelligence literature on all of this. The intent is demonstrably real.
This is very different from the "climate emergency" scam, where the technocrats know they are engaged in an advanced deception operation about something which does not exist. In the case of biodigital convergence, the aim is precisely to fund it into existence. Which is why we need to take it very seriously indeed.
Also known as Directed Energy weapons (DEW), this CNN investigative report was 40 years ago.
1985 CNN - RF (Radio Frequency) Weaponry
Video: https://rumble.com/v4hnblk-1985-cnn-multi-part-investigative-report-rf-radio-frequency-weaponry.html
Scalar Wars: The Brave New World of Scalar Electromagnetics by Bill Morgan
Bill Morgan has compiled most of Lt. Col Tom E. Bearden's scalar wave work http://prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm
Then there were reports of DEW in play during the 1989 Panama Invasion, as documented in th Academy Award Winning 1992 documentary: The Panama Deception.
There was also the 2006 investigative report - Star Wars in Iraq - That documented the possible use of DEW in 2003 during Desert Storm....
Dean Warwick talks about other DEW tech from the 1950's and 1960's in this article of mine...
David Icke's disinformation on 9/11
Why did David backtrack on his 2002 book?
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-icke-on-911
Thank you for the transcript; I prefer to read over watching and listening. It allows me to digest the information a bit more. :)
Already over two years ago, there was a poetic variety of ways to "vaccinate" people:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/no-need-for-any-more-vaccinations
Since the end of May, 2023, "vaccination" through the food supply has also been legit:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/save-the-animals
Not to mention "vaccines" said to be capable of spreading through the air...