Omniwar: Defining Features, Examples, and Aim; Technocracy as an Assault on Liberty; Who are "They"?; AI; Depopulation; Principles of Resistance; Reasons for Optimism; Unresolved Theoretical Debates
It's hard to see how a shift from the current dominant capitalist corporate-controlled society could be forged towards an alternative theoretical and workable model such as a mix of true anarchism, true Marxism or true libertarianism.
The capitalist 'controllers' (the numeric few) still hold the levers of power (Big Money) - for now at least.
How could such a popular shift be energised and shaped? It seems to me that's a really tantalising question!
The technocratic grid is bearing down on us hard - maybe THAT will force a forged volcanic-organic solution? I don't yet detect any realistic parallel society solutions - but 'something's gotta give' sooner rather than later.
Fantastic, David. Excellent points on Marxism. I’ve read Das Kapital so have a certain understanding of Marxism. We need to reappropriate it! Thank you so much.
Unfortunately, the programming around Marxism is even more deeply rooted, and even more powerful than that around "vaccine" refusal.
The responses are typically very similar: arrogant knee-jerk dismissals despite lack of familiarity with key information, resort to name-calling and ad hominem attacks, rage/being triggered, leaving the scene and refusing to engage in reasoned discussion, aggression/nastiness, resort to cliches, etc.
The key difference is that whereas most people outside of Camp 1 have woken up to the dangers of "vaccines," they remain oblivious to the programming around Marxism and end up unwittingly propagating and reinforcing it.
Great interview David covering the main point in the timescales allowed. I would also suggest that although the current techniques being employed in the OMNIWAR are very powerful as far as mind control is concerned, they are built on the bedrock of far older techniques stretching back into antiquity. It was said (and I admit I don't know the actual source but Alan Watt mentioned it) that the elite comprise 3% of the population, the opposition 3% of the population (us in other words), 7% of the population are the enforcers (police, military), and the other 87% are the rest of the population. This was apparently the way i always has been in known history which then leads to the speculation as to whether this is something to do with conscious awareness or perhaps the basic mind control of languages written by a priest class. After all children are highly suggestible until around the age of 7 (clay on a potters wheel), so when their world is spoken into existence through languages, there must be limitations involved. Of course this may not be relevant at the current time but it is always worth bearing in mind that it is their system and as Plato commented the culture is created from the top down and grass roots movements are at the very least under strict control.
I suppose it also depends how you would define "this way" i.e. what is acceptable and what is not, in other words what is your intended outcome. Researchers like Alan Watt have said that we have been under intense mind control for a very long time, the latest techniques being just icing on the cake so to speak. Not stating that the situation is impossible to change but that it may require more than many believe. Anyway we will just have to agree to differ on that one!
It's hard to see how a shift from the current dominant capitalist corporate-controlled society could be forged towards an alternative theoretical and workable model such as a mix of true anarchism, true Marxism or true libertarianism.
The capitalist 'controllers' (the numeric few) still hold the levers of power (Big Money) - for now at least.
How could such a popular shift be energised and shaped? It seems to me that's a really tantalising question!
The technocratic grid is bearing down on us hard - maybe THAT will force a forged volcanic-organic solution? I don't yet detect any realistic parallel society solutions - but 'something's gotta give' sooner rather than later.
I agree. We stand on the brink on a world-historical transformation.
This is why it is more important than ever to get these theoretical debates ironed out, so that we can see most clearly what is needed going forwards.
Fantastic, David. Excellent points on Marxism. I’ve read Das Kapital so have a certain understanding of Marxism. We need to reappropriate it! Thank you so much.
Thanks, Joanna.
Unfortunately, the programming around Marxism is even more deeply rooted, and even more powerful than that around "vaccine" refusal.
The responses are typically very similar: arrogant knee-jerk dismissals despite lack of familiarity with key information, resort to name-calling and ad hominem attacks, rage/being triggered, leaving the scene and refusing to engage in reasoned discussion, aggression/nastiness, resort to cliches, etc.
The key difference is that whereas most people outside of Camp 1 have woken up to the dangers of "vaccines," they remain oblivious to the programming around Marxism and end up unwittingly propagating and reinforcing it.
Great interview David covering the main point in the timescales allowed. I would also suggest that although the current techniques being employed in the OMNIWAR are very powerful as far as mind control is concerned, they are built on the bedrock of far older techniques stretching back into antiquity. It was said (and I admit I don't know the actual source but Alan Watt mentioned it) that the elite comprise 3% of the population, the opposition 3% of the population (us in other words), 7% of the population are the enforcers (police, military), and the other 87% are the rest of the population. This was apparently the way i always has been in known history which then leads to the speculation as to whether this is something to do with conscious awareness or perhaps the basic mind control of languages written by a priest class. After all children are highly suggestible until around the age of 7 (clay on a potters wheel), so when their world is spoken into existence through languages, there must be limitations involved. Of course this may not be relevant at the current time but it is always worth bearing in mind that it is their system and as Plato commented the culture is created from the top down and grass roots movements are at the very least under strict control.
I disagree that things have always been this way and always will be. For me, that is too static a view of history.
It also radically underestimates the power of the 87%, who are essentially dismissed as NPCs when in fact their agency is enormous.
I suppose it also depends how you would define "this way" i.e. what is acceptable and what is not, in other words what is your intended outcome. Researchers like Alan Watt have said that we have been under intense mind control for a very long time, the latest techniques being just icing on the cake so to speak. Not stating that the situation is impossible to change but that it may require more than many believe. Anyway we will just have to agree to differ on that one!
Is it ok the share this interview on other social media like Telegram ?
Of course.