I appreciate your clarifying the dubious nature of a claimed COVID pandemic and virology in general. The former can be laid to rest by the work and research of Denis Rancourt and the latter by the Doctors Bailey both of whom have valuable substacks which go into the details.
The power of a Dr Fauci is not in tangible results arising from Gain of Function viruses but rather in his decades long control over funding dispersals to his favored institutions and cronies.
As you mentioned, energy (source, production, control, etc.) has a fundamental role in technocracy… and I believe the following dynamic (which of course is just one of many that are serving as impetus for tyranny) is vital for more people to become aware of.
I think this dynamic can most easily be described via scenario, (please forgive me for outlining many things you’re already aware of):
Essentially the ruling elites remain in power predominantly due to the leverage they have over economic and legal systems.
Economic system:
The world’s population is extremely dependent (and rapidly becoming even more so) on goods and services that come from elite-owned industries. Technology that promotes an extraordinary degree of self-sufficiency would slow down, and then reverse this ‘dependency trend’. In turn, the elites’ increasing leverage over humanity would slow down, and then decrease; making them increasingly vulnerable to portions of the population that currently pose no threat to them.
Legal system:
The elites are quite literally above the law because they’ve captured the legal system. They commit heinous crimes on a daily basis, and there are no checks and balances to hold them accountable… as long as the legal system continues to remain captured by them. Again, various forms of leverage remain central to the elites maintaining their power over the legal system. If their power and wealth were to decrease, it is only reasonable to predict that as time passes, their influence over the legal system would decrease; leaving them increasingly vulnerable to being in a position where they are no longer above the law. Furthermore, anything even close to resembling justice for the unspeakable crimes they’ve committed, would result in life imprisonment, if not capital punishment.
So what could usher in a situation that would upend the current power differential between the elites, and the rest of the world’s population? … I would argue that this would happen if somehow the masses became largely self-sufficient in meeting their needs, and no longer relied on goods and services that are under the control of the elites. … Some form of technology would have to be distributed to the masses that would allow them to break free from their dependency on the elites.
At this point it’s virtually certain that there are suppressed technologies (both manmade, and *not* man-made) that would make it possible for people to have access to energy sources the elites do not control… and cannot control in a capitalist society; a society founded upon private ownership of property (land, technology, intellectual, etc.).
However, if the world was under a technocratic tyranny- - where the state owns everything, and people can only “borrow” (technologies) from the state- - then that solves the elite’s risk of people becoming self-sufficient as a result of having ownership of goods that run on this technology... the state could seize anything it wants, anyone they want, and at any point. Hence Schwab’s, “you will own nothing and be happy” statement fits quite well with this dynamic. To keep their power, the elites must not allow people to have unfettered access to anything that could promote self-sufficiency.
So the worldwide shift towards technocracy has quite a few facets… and the one that I described above, is one that I believe more people need to become aware of; the preemptive installation of technocratic tyranny prior to rolling out forms of technology that is currently deeply suppressed, classified, and/or siloed.
Yes, I agree with this. If, as Judy Wood contends, the destruction of the Twin Towers provides evidence of free energy technology, then there is no need for the masses to be dependent on the ruling class for energy. This means of production simply has to be expropriated.
Many thanks for bringing this to my attention, John. I had not heard of Battelle Memorial before, but I will certainly be looking into it now. Ditto for Dr. Roger Lier.
I appreciate your clarifying the dubious nature of a claimed COVID pandemic and virology in general. The former can be laid to rest by the work and research of Denis Rancourt and the latter by the Doctors Bailey both of whom have valuable substacks which go into the details.
The power of a Dr Fauci is not in tangible results arising from Gain of Function viruses but rather in his decades long control over funding dispersals to his favored institutions and cronies.
As you mentioned, energy (source, production, control, etc.) has a fundamental role in technocracy… and I believe the following dynamic (which of course is just one of many that are serving as impetus for tyranny) is vital for more people to become aware of.
I think this dynamic can most easily be described via scenario, (please forgive me for outlining many things you’re already aware of):
Essentially the ruling elites remain in power predominantly due to the leverage they have over economic and legal systems.
Economic system:
The world’s population is extremely dependent (and rapidly becoming even more so) on goods and services that come from elite-owned industries. Technology that promotes an extraordinary degree of self-sufficiency would slow down, and then reverse this ‘dependency trend’. In turn, the elites’ increasing leverage over humanity would slow down, and then decrease; making them increasingly vulnerable to portions of the population that currently pose no threat to them.
Legal system:
The elites are quite literally above the law because they’ve captured the legal system. They commit heinous crimes on a daily basis, and there are no checks and balances to hold them accountable… as long as the legal system continues to remain captured by them. Again, various forms of leverage remain central to the elites maintaining their power over the legal system. If their power and wealth were to decrease, it is only reasonable to predict that as time passes, their influence over the legal system would decrease; leaving them increasingly vulnerable to being in a position where they are no longer above the law. Furthermore, anything even close to resembling justice for the unspeakable crimes they’ve committed, would result in life imprisonment, if not capital punishment.
So what could usher in a situation that would upend the current power differential between the elites, and the rest of the world’s population? … I would argue that this would happen if somehow the masses became largely self-sufficient in meeting their needs, and no longer relied on goods and services that are under the control of the elites. … Some form of technology would have to be distributed to the masses that would allow them to break free from their dependency on the elites.
At this point it’s virtually certain that there are suppressed technologies (both manmade, and *not* man-made) that would make it possible for people to have access to energy sources the elites do not control… and cannot control in a capitalist society; a society founded upon private ownership of property (land, technology, intellectual, etc.).
However, if the world was under a technocratic tyranny- - where the state owns everything, and people can only “borrow” (technologies) from the state- - then that solves the elite’s risk of people becoming self-sufficient as a result of having ownership of goods that run on this technology... the state could seize anything it wants, anyone they want, and at any point. Hence Schwab’s, “you will own nothing and be happy” statement fits quite well with this dynamic. To keep their power, the elites must not allow people to have unfettered access to anything that could promote self-sufficiency.
So the worldwide shift towards technocracy has quite a few facets… and the one that I described above, is one that I believe more people need to become aware of; the preemptive installation of technocratic tyranny prior to rolling out forms of technology that is currently deeply suppressed, classified, and/or siloed.
Yes, I agree with this. If, as Judy Wood contends, the destruction of the Twin Towers provides evidence of free energy technology, then there is no need for the masses to be dependent on the ruling class for energy. This means of production simply has to be expropriated.
A great interview, great info from both interviewer and interviewee : ) Have shared. Just love sharing good information.
Thanks, Kim!
Cool, calm and collected. Both you and Gary. A great one to share.
Thank you!
Rapidly gaining traction. Bravo.
Thanks, Gordon!
Is there a way to get a transcript of this so we can share it and educate the world?
Yes - just click the "Transcript" button to the right of "Share."
It would have been useful if Gary knew when to shut up and let you speak
I guess different interviewers have different styles...
Many thanks for bringing this to my attention, John. I had not heard of Battelle Memorial before, but I will certainly be looking into it now. Ditto for Dr. Roger Lier.