The social (and biological) control which you refer to throughout this interview is indeed already well underway, it would appear, and has been for some time. The woman who is shown by Wallace as discussing "Omics" and her thoughts on "Genomics" in particular in respect of the injections...she has some very interesting thoughts.
Edit / update: While Wallace strikes me as an intelligent lady, I'm not sure how reliable some of her conclusions are (nor am I confident of the reasoning process she used to get to some of these conclusions, to put it kindly). Clearly a very bright lady, but not a reliable source of information in my humble opinion. CC @dhughes
There is still so much we don't know about what's actually happening. I'm not sure I entirely agree with Wallace's take, but I am grateful for her research and willingness to speak out. Here is another woman who is doing formidable work and whose work is well worth following. This one is definitely worth bookmarking:
David - note that this interview should *not* be listened to with children around as some of what is shared becomes incredibly disturbing (when describing fantasies generated by the A*I).
Interesting discussion on "resilience". Apparently it was the buzzword for 2021. When you think about it, we actually need to be quite the opposite and absolutely inflexible, at least as regards non-compliance with their BS. The mouse experiment intrigues me. I'm wondering what part of the brain they targeted or whether it was a particular gene. It sounds a bit like the effects of a lobotomy with the mouse becoming emotionally numb or indifferent, but not actually fearless. As for the timeline, if there is one, 2025 is not looking good. Many people falling sick down my way, including lots of died suddenlies amongst the young and middle-aged reported in local newspaper. Most of them probably only got the 2 mandatory shots in 2021 and were fine up until now.
The mouse experiment potentially has worse implications than I described in the interview, because it involved graphene oxide (which some people think was in the shots, I'm not sure). Here's my unpublished draft on this material:
In rats, it is known that graphene oxide injected into the diencephalon region of the brain leads to ablation of survival behaviors (Biagoni et al., 2021). Even though the lead author of that paper, Laura Ballerini, writing for the EU Graphene Flagship, tries to spin the results in terms of preventing anxiety and PTSD, the results of her study demonstrate, in her own words, that “Two days after injecting graphene oxide into a specific region of the mouse’s brain, it behaved like other mice that had never experienced the smell of a cat in their home environment” (cited in Foley, 2021). In other words, the mice with graphene oxide injected into their brain would have been helpless against their main predator.
Is it a stretch of the imagination to think that substances such as graphene oxide, injected into human bodies and crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB), could induce a similar response, i.e., helplessness in the face of a predator class? It is known, for instance, that carbon-based nanomaterials, such as graphene, can cross the BBB following peripheral injection (Calabrese et al., 2021, § 4.2, Figure 3). According to Hanna et al. (2020), incorporating drugs into nanocarriers capable of penetrating the BBB is “a simple technique.”
I just read your Solari report for the third time this morning and I plan on reading your other material, which I’ve not done yet, about Manchester (just got my printer fixed— so able to print stuff and read), but I just need to say, as the need comes up every two minutes, that yours is the only writing, from my perspective, worth reading these days. Not only what you write about, but how you write what you write about. Incredible. Whatever the hell you’re doing, it’s a profound gift— the gift of understanding what’s worth saying/knowing and the gift of communication, which you’re a genius at.
And on this subject of things worth knowing: I’ve been thinking a lot about technocrats, those who need to control others. I’ve been thinking about other human types: the sadist I almost married, the controllers in my family, the murderer I once dated, the “Karens” who surround me today, the addicts I’ve known, the addict who was once my best friend who today lives in a car … been thinking about humans of this sort and other sorts, those I encounter whenever I have the guts to leave my little room and go into the world to buy a pickle…
And I came up with a very UN-original understanding about people this morning, an equation which at least for me captures the WHY most people do as they do, are as they are. Here is the equation, compiled through years of thinking and EVERY WORD OF IT LIFTED FROM somebody else’s writing!
EQUATION:
People with an UN-explored/UN-wanted self PLUS who fear and thus hate deep feeling become people who need to control others, need to win over others and need certainty (no matter how inane that certainty is).
Well, that’s it. My great contribution to the world of the intellect; a contribution I assume half the world already knows…
Restack, restack. Testimonials of the power of a personal connection to one's creator and that source of divine goodness is growing as evidence it is a protector of those we love, our children and those working for the good. It resonates out into the aether and that is what these criminals have no access to. You are being censored unfortunately. A media booster specialist may help. Many need to hear all of this.
I live on a farm in California and spend a lot of time with my hands in the dirt. There is something about this connection that grounds me (no pun intended). The squirrels chewed up the landline wires so we use cell phones now, but we are old enough to control that addiction better than our younger staff does. None of them read books or commit poetry to memory which is to say they don’t exercise their minds. I wonder where this will all lead us. We used to think that every 25 years would result in some substantial change in the environment, but these days, the span of time is more like every five years. That amount of change is too hard on a person.
That is a point of view worth thinking about, and I will.
On your comment about everybody in that decimated town center using a cell phone, I was in Tibet 20 years ago. I remember walking around a temple watching people swing their prayer wheels with one hand while talking on their cell phones with the other. I was shocked that they did not honor their religious observance enough to put the phone down. In Lhasa, there was very little indoor plumbing. People defecated in the streets, but everybody I saw had a cell phone. Cell phone technology had leapfrogged over basic infrastructure needs that were infinitely more important for keeping the people alive and healthy.
I agree, we are looking at a rapidly accelerating rate of change that threatens to leave most people behind.
Just today, I was wondering through a decimated town centre in the UK contemplating the scene of desolation before me, coupled with the knowledge that every single person I could see had a "smart" phone on their person. On the one hand, it was like history was moving backwards, but, on the other hand, everyone was subjugated by the latest mind control technologies.
One of the reasons I place class at the centre of my analytical framework is that it helps us to cut through what is happening. There is a numerically miniscule transnational ruling class that is seeking to use highly advanced technology to subjugate, and ultimately enslave, everyone else.
In my opinion, if we can see it that way, then we need not fall prey to a sense of powerlessness that "technology" is "running away." Rather, we need to focus on how to overcome the predator class that wishes to do us harm.
We need to do major diligence on who actually gets to see the interviews on such sites as Alex Jones' and other larger platforms. I've seen many presentations that seemed they would reach large audiences but in fact did not and just like senate testimonials we've seen who did they really reach? The AI and controls are vast and more determined than we think to give the impression some are given a bigger platform when they are not. But I do think we are seeing this horror system in retreat but I take nothing for granted. Trump has agreed to do what for the pirate class? Surely something but what? I've seen nanotech most have not. It is impotent unless people are not connected to truth on the ground and the divine source that landed them here.
People congratulated me on making a breakthrough in terms of numbers reached with the Alex Jones interview, yet it barely had an impact in terms of new subscribers, paid or unpaid.
What about the work of Robert Brame, the forensic arborist of 40 yrs who provides evidence for his claim that some of the California fires and the Maui fire were not naturally occurring fires, they were likely EMF instigated. Have you seen his work?
Interesting interview - thanks for posting. David, have you seen this?
https://odysee.com/@Psinergy_vault:8/Wireless-Genomics-3:6
The social (and biological) control which you refer to throughout this interview is indeed already well underway, it would appear, and has been for some time. The woman who is shown by Wallace as discussing "Omics" and her thoughts on "Genomics" in particular in respect of the injections...she has some very interesting thoughts.
Edit / update: While Wallace strikes me as an intelligent lady, I'm not sure how reliable some of her conclusions are (nor am I confident of the reasoning process she used to get to some of these conclusions, to put it kindly). Clearly a very bright lady, but not a reliable source of information in my humble opinion. CC @dhughes
Thanks for sharing. I will bookmark it to watch later!
There is still so much we don't know about what's actually happening. I'm not sure I entirely agree with Wallace's take, but I am grateful for her research and willingness to speak out. Here is another woman who is doing formidable work and whose work is well worth following. This one is definitely worth bookmarking:
Sara Israel - https://bibledecode.substack.com/
This interview is striking, for example:
https://open.substack.com/pub/bibledecode/p/ai-assimilations-virtual-and-augmented?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
David - note that this interview should *not* be listened to with children around as some of what is shared becomes incredibly disturbing (when describing fantasies generated by the A*I).
Interesting discussion on "resilience". Apparently it was the buzzword for 2021. When you think about it, we actually need to be quite the opposite and absolutely inflexible, at least as regards non-compliance with their BS. The mouse experiment intrigues me. I'm wondering what part of the brain they targeted or whether it was a particular gene. It sounds a bit like the effects of a lobotomy with the mouse becoming emotionally numb or indifferent, but not actually fearless. As for the timeline, if there is one, 2025 is not looking good. Many people falling sick down my way, including lots of died suddenlies amongst the young and middle-aged reported in local newspaper. Most of them probably only got the 2 mandatory shots in 2021 and were fine up until now.
The mouse experiment potentially has worse implications than I described in the interview, because it involved graphene oxide (which some people think was in the shots, I'm not sure). Here's my unpublished draft on this material:
In rats, it is known that graphene oxide injected into the diencephalon region of the brain leads to ablation of survival behaviors (Biagoni et al., 2021). Even though the lead author of that paper, Laura Ballerini, writing for the EU Graphene Flagship, tries to spin the results in terms of preventing anxiety and PTSD, the results of her study demonstrate, in her own words, that “Two days after injecting graphene oxide into a specific region of the mouse’s brain, it behaved like other mice that had never experienced the smell of a cat in their home environment” (cited in Foley, 2021). In other words, the mice with graphene oxide injected into their brain would have been helpless against their main predator.
Is it a stretch of the imagination to think that substances such as graphene oxide, injected into human bodies and crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB), could induce a similar response, i.e., helplessness in the face of a predator class? It is known, for instance, that carbon-based nanomaterials, such as graphene, can cross the BBB following peripheral injection (Calabrese et al., 2021, § 4.2, Figure 3). According to Hanna et al. (2020), incorporating drugs into nanocarriers capable of penetrating the BBB is “a simple technique.”
No stretch of the imagination at all. Makes perfect sense. It would be good to get Peter Breggin interested in this topic or Michael Nehls.
Yes, I did send this to Peter Breggin in September.
On a different topic, this may interest you: https://x.com/JMCDelingpole/status/1890835653887197646. That's twice now!
Great Interview! Thank you!
and...
David,
I just read your Solari report for the third time this morning and I plan on reading your other material, which I’ve not done yet, about Manchester (just got my printer fixed— so able to print stuff and read), but I just need to say, as the need comes up every two minutes, that yours is the only writing, from my perspective, worth reading these days. Not only what you write about, but how you write what you write about. Incredible. Whatever the hell you’re doing, it’s a profound gift— the gift of understanding what’s worth saying/knowing and the gift of communication, which you’re a genius at.
And on this subject of things worth knowing: I’ve been thinking a lot about technocrats, those who need to control others. I’ve been thinking about other human types: the sadist I almost married, the controllers in my family, the murderer I once dated, the “Karens” who surround me today, the addicts I’ve known, the addict who was once my best friend who today lives in a car … been thinking about humans of this sort and other sorts, those I encounter whenever I have the guts to leave my little room and go into the world to buy a pickle…
And I came up with a very UN-original understanding about people this morning, an equation which at least for me captures the WHY most people do as they do, are as they are. Here is the equation, compiled through years of thinking and EVERY WORD OF IT LIFTED FROM somebody else’s writing!
EQUATION:
People with an UN-explored/UN-wanted self PLUS who fear and thus hate deep feeling become people who need to control others, need to win over others and need certainty (no matter how inane that certainty is).
Well, that’s it. My great contribution to the world of the intellect; a contribution I assume half the world already knows…
🌺
Loren Hecht
www.lorenhecht.net
Thank you, Loren. You are very kind.
I hope you're not still surrounded by sadists, murderers, and addicts!
I think you're right that the perceived need to control others comes from a profound level of insecurity in oneself.
Hope to speak with you again soon.
Restack, restack. Testimonials of the power of a personal connection to one's creator and that source of divine goodness is growing as evidence it is a protector of those we love, our children and those working for the good. It resonates out into the aether and that is what these criminals have no access to. You are being censored unfortunately. A media booster specialist may help. Many need to hear all of this.
I live on a farm in California and spend a lot of time with my hands in the dirt. There is something about this connection that grounds me (no pun intended). The squirrels chewed up the landline wires so we use cell phones now, but we are old enough to control that addiction better than our younger staff does. None of them read books or commit poetry to memory which is to say they don’t exercise their minds. I wonder where this will all lead us. We used to think that every 25 years would result in some substantial change in the environment, but these days, the span of time is more like every five years. That amount of change is too hard on a person.
That is a point of view worth thinking about, and I will.
On your comment about everybody in that decimated town center using a cell phone, I was in Tibet 20 years ago. I remember walking around a temple watching people swing their prayer wheels with one hand while talking on their cell phones with the other. I was shocked that they did not honor their religious observance enough to put the phone down. In Lhasa, there was very little indoor plumbing. People defecated in the streets, but everybody I saw had a cell phone. Cell phone technology had leapfrogged over basic infrastructure needs that were infinitely more important for keeping the people alive and healthy.
That's powerful - even before smart phones, the warning signs were there.
I agree, we are looking at a rapidly accelerating rate of change that threatens to leave most people behind.
Just today, I was wondering through a decimated town centre in the UK contemplating the scene of desolation before me, coupled with the knowledge that every single person I could see had a "smart" phone on their person. On the one hand, it was like history was moving backwards, but, on the other hand, everyone was subjugated by the latest mind control technologies.
One of the reasons I place class at the centre of my analytical framework is that it helps us to cut through what is happening. There is a numerically miniscule transnational ruling class that is seeking to use highly advanced technology to subjugate, and ultimately enslave, everyone else.
In my opinion, if we can see it that way, then we need not fall prey to a sense of powerlessness that "technology" is "running away." Rather, we need to focus on how to overcome the predator class that wishes to do us harm.
Any chance of having a follow-up discussion with Lissa Johnson? Cheers.
We'll hopefully be doing Omniwar: Battle For The Brain together on April 26, 2025.
Really looking forward to this new Omniwar. Curious things and bed partners coming to fore in the Dept. Of Ed here in the U.S.
Are you familiar with this author? He has highlighted negative information re: the Heritage Foundations role in a recent article.
Sorry. Posted before ready. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/03/investigative-series/education-international-and-the-global-push-to-inject-the-4ir-and-transhumanism-into-schools/
Yikes. Never mind. I just found a connection of his to the Austrian School….nope. He sounds like a classicist, but perhaps only a poser.
We need to do major diligence on who actually gets to see the interviews on such sites as Alex Jones' and other larger platforms. I've seen many presentations that seemed they would reach large audiences but in fact did not and just like senate testimonials we've seen who did they really reach? The AI and controls are vast and more determined than we think to give the impression some are given a bigger platform when they are not. But I do think we are seeing this horror system in retreat but I take nothing for granted. Trump has agreed to do what for the pirate class? Surely something but what? I've seen nanotech most have not. It is impotent unless people are not connected to truth on the ground and the divine source that landed them here.
I agree, no one really knows who is seeing what.
People congratulated me on making a breakthrough in terms of numbers reached with the Alex Jones interview, yet it barely had an impact in terms of new subscribers, paid or unpaid.
Well clearly it deserves a congratulations since this signals you are hitting the targets and it looks like all of them.
What about the work of Robert Brame, the forensic arborist of 40 yrs who provides evidence for his claim that some of the California fires and the Maui fire were not naturally occurring fires, they were likely EMF instigated. Have you seen his work?
https://rumble.com/v3fv3yd-arborist-explains-how-trees-did-not-burn-and-why-in-maui-and-other-recent-f.html
https://protectandalert.substack.com/p/robert-brame-forensic-arborist-reporting
https://rumble.com/embed/v3xaji9/?pub=m6fb1
Thanks, yes, I have properly looked into it, but it appears suspicious, doesn't it?
Ditto for the colour blue.