In Defence of Judy Wood

In this video presentation, I defend the work of Judy Wood, in particular her book Where Did The Towers Go? (2011).

In five parts, I

1. review the key evidence that Wood presents;

2. inquire into the temperatures that were involved in the destruction of the Twin Towers, arguing that the “nanothermite” and “mini-nuke” hypotheses, with their claims of super-high temperatures, are implausible and most likely manufactured;

3. note the perception management role of the “nanothermite” hypothesis in steering attention away from the presence of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction;

4. discuss the role of black technology, particularly in relation to so-called “cold fusion,” which, if real (as revealed on September 11, 2001), has the potential to solve the world’s energy crises; and

5. note the limitations of Wood’s research. I do not accept the “Hurricane Erin” hypothesis, nor do I think that the Alaskan magnetometer data reveals anything significant.

As Andrew Johnson recognised years ago, there are three key layers to perception management: (i) the official narrative, (ii) the official approved alternative narrative, and (iii) the truth.

Most people, it seems, fall into Camp 1, blindly believing whatever the government and the mainstream media tell them, unable to think for themselves. For those who make it out of Camp 1 into Camp 2, a decoy narrative awaits, promoted by organised fake dissidents. Because it is a military operation, Camp 2 is vaster than most sceptics of Camp 1 would ever expect: its fake heroes, relentlessly promoted on “alternative” channels, are intended to hoover up opposition voices. Very few people make it out of Camp 2 into Camp 3, where the truth awaits.

In the case of “9/11,” the official narrative was “Muslim hijackers,” the approved alternative narrative was “nanothermite,” and the truth was black technology used to destroy the Twin Towers as exposed by Wood’s research.

In the case of “Covid-19,” the official narrative is a deadly virus, the approved alternative narrative is anything related to public health/pharmaceuticals, and the truth is a deep state military operation involving bio-nano technology.

This presentation was originally intended to supplement an article of the same title which was accepted for publication by Covert Action Magazine in September 2023. Yet, on October 15, 2023, while details such as author bio were being finalised, I unexpectedly received the following from managing editor Jeremy Kuzmarov:

I am sorry to report that someone higher up than me at CovertAction Magazine pulled your article and that there was a coordinated group on the board of directors of the magazine intent on not having it published. I thought people were more open minded in the organization but was wrong. I fear that they succumb to exactly the phenomenon you describe of people who ridicule something when not having actually read the article or book and know nothing of the topic. I am extremely upset by this. unfortunately it is/was out of my control.

Thus, it would appear that some form of covert action is at work within CovertAction Magazine itself, capable of overriding a “managing editor” when it comes to Wood’s research.

Rather than re-record the presentation, I have left in the reference to CovertAction Magazine as a reminder of its censorship of Wood’s research.

Update June 21, 2024

Today I was contacted by someone claiming to have been removed from the board of CovertAction Magazine. Referencing a conversation with Kuzmarov, they write:

“We are both very sorry your exemplary work got censored by CovertAction’s gatekeepers. […] It seems everyone we like gets blocked. […] We refer these board members as gatekeepers. They are the state department, Democracy Now!, Lock-down, trump derangement syndrome, left.

The irony of CovertAction Magazine, of all sources, being infiltrated by “gatekeepers” is palpable.